ArticleBMC public health2022
Human papillomavirus vaccine beliefs and practice characteristics in rural and urban adolescent care providers.
Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare worker practices for HPV vaccine recommendation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Pooled it
- Awareness and Acceptance of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine and Associated Factors Among Parents of Adolescents (9-18 Years) at a Children's Hospital in Babol, Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Young adult perspectives on deciding to get human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in urban and rural communities: A qualitative research study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Lack of knowledge, not vaccine hesitancy, is the main cause of low human papilloma virus vaccination rate among systemic lupus erythematosus patients in Japan after suspension of proactive recommendation: Analysis of a patients' survey.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025Article
- From awareness to acceptance: understanding HPV and vaccine knowledge, attitudes and beliefs among university students in Punjab, Pakistan.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Urban and rural healthcare providers' perspectives on HPV vaccination in Minnesota.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Age nine is possible: Improving age 9 HPV initiation through a national quality improvement initiative during the COVID-19 pandemic.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Understanding Prognostic Factors for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: A Rural Community Case-Control Study.Vaccines · 2023Article
- Inequities in Screening and HPV Vaccination Programs and Their Impact on Cervical Cancer Statistics in Romania.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is recommended for all adolescents age 11-12 years. HPV vaccine coverage remains suboptimal in the United States though, particularly in rural areas. We surveyed adolescent immunization providers in two Midwestern states to assess rural vs. urban differences in HPV vaccine resources, practices, and attitudes.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was sent to all licensed adolescent care providers in a subset of urban and rural counties in Minnesota and Wisconsin during 2019. Multivariable regression was used to identify attitudes and practices that differentiated rural vs. urban providers.
resultsThere were 437 survey respondents (31% rural). Significantly fewer rural providers had evening/weekend adolescent vaccination appointments available (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.21 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12, 0.36]), had prior experience with adolescent vaccine quality improvement projects (aOR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.28, 0.98]), and routinely recommended HPV vaccine during urgent/acute care visits (aOR = 0.37 [95% CI: 0.18, 0.79]). Significantly more rural providers had standing orders to administer all recommended adolescent vaccines (aOR = 2.81 [95% CI: 1.61, 4.91]) and reported giving HPV vaccine information to their patients/families before it is due (aOR = 3.10 [95% CI: 1.68, 5.71]).
conclusionsRural vs. urban differences in provider practices were mixed in that rural providers do not implement some practices that may promote HPV vaccination, but do implement other practices that promote HPV vaccination. It remains unclear how the observed differences would affect HPV vaccine attitudes or adolescent vaccination decisions for parents in rural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.