Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35810261›Full record

ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Artificial intelligence and novel approaches for treatment of non-union in bone : From established standard methods in medicine up to novel fields of research].

Marie K Reumann, Benedikt J Braun, Maximilian M Menger, Fabian Springer, Johann Jazewitsch, Tobias Schwarz, Andreas Nüssler, Tina Histing, Mika F R Rollmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Diagnostic and therapeutic work-up of infected tibial nonunion].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marie K ReumannKlinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie an der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, BG Klinik Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. mreumann@bgu-tuebingen.de.
Benedikt J BraunKlinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie an der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, BG Klinik Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Maximilian M MengerKlinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie an der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, BG Klinik Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Fabian SpringerKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Johann JazewitschSiegfried Weller Institut für Unfallmedizinische Forschung an der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, BG Klinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Tobias SchwarzSiegfried Weller Institut für Unfallmedizinische Forschung an der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, BG Klinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Andreas NüsslerSiegfried Weller Institut für Unfallmedizinische Forschung an der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, BG Klinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Tina HistingKlinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie an der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, BG Klinik Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Mika F R RollmannKlinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie an der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, BG Klinik Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods of artificial intelligence (AI) have found applications in many fields of medicine within the last few years. Some disciplines already use these methods regularly within their clinical routine. However, the fields of application are wide and there are still many opportunities to apply these new AI concepts. This review article gives an insight into the history of AI and defines the special terms and fields, such as machine learning (ML), neural networks and deep learning. The classical steps in developing AI models are demonstrated here, as well as the iteration of data rectification and preparation, the training of a model and subsequent validation before transfer into a clinical setting are explained. Currently, musculoskeletal disciplines implement methods of ML and also neural networks, e.g. for identification of fractures or for classifications. Also, predictive models based on risk factor analysis for prevention of complications are being initiated. As non-union in bone is a rare but very complex disease with dramatic socioeconomic impact for the healthcare system, many open questions arise which could be better understood by using methods of AI in the future. New fields of research applying AI models range from predictive models and cost analysis to personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

MedicineMusculoskeletal SystemArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerCost analysisData scienceFracture healingPersonalized medicinePrediction models

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.