Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35810255›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

DeepBacs for multi-task bacterial image analysis using open-source deep learning approaches.

Christoph Spahn, Estibaliz Gómez-de-Mariscal, Romain F Laine, Pedro M Pereira, Lucas von Chamier, Mia Conduit, Mariana G Pinho, Guillaume Jacquemet, Séamus Holden, Mike Heilemann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AI-Enabled Imaging for Pathogen Detection Under Stress Conditions: A Systematic Review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Christoph SpahnDepartment of Natural Products in Organismic Interaction, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany. christoph.spahn@mpi-marburg.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9886-2263
Estibaliz Gómez-de-MariscalInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.
Romain F LaineMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2151-4487
Pedro M PereiraInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1426-9540
Lucas von ChamierMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Mia ConduitCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Newcastle University Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE24AX, United Kingdom.
Mariana G PinhoInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7132-8842
Guillaume JacquemetTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
Séamus HoldenCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Newcastle University Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE24AX, United Kingdom.
Mike HeilemannInstitute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. heilemann@chemie.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9821-3578
Ricardo HenriquesInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal. rjhenriques@igc.gulbenkian.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-5234
Goethe University Frankfurt · DENewcastle University · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTÅbo Akademi University · FIInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência · PTMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T027924/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203276/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work demonstrates and guides how to use a range of state-of-the-art artificial neural-networks to analyse bacterial microscopy images using the recently developed ZeroCostDL4Mic platform. We generated a database of image datasets used to train networks for various image analysis tasks and present strategies for data acquisition and curation, as well as model training. We showcase different deep learning (DL) approaches for segmenting bright field and fluorescence images of different bacterial species, use object detection to classify different growth stages in time-lapse imaging data, and carry out DL-assisted phenotypic profiling of antibiotic-treated cells. To also demonstrate the ability of DL to enhance low-phototoxicity live-cell microscopy, we showcase how image denoising can allow researchers to attain high-fidelity data in faster and longer imaging. Finally, artificial labelling of cell membranes and predictions of super-resolution images allow for accurate mapping of cell shape and intracellular targets. Our purposefully-built database of training and testing data aids in novice users' training, enabling them to quickly explore how to analyse their data through DL. We hope this lays a fertile ground for the efficient application of DL in microbiology and fosters the creation of tools for bacterial cell biology and antibiotic research.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID35810255
PMCPMC9271087
OpenAlexW4284972116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.