ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2023
RoCS: Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic curriculum and development strategies in robotic abdominal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of comprehensive Robotic-assisted surgical (RAS) curricula.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping the learning curve of robotic cholecystectomy: a multi‑surgeon cohort analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Feasibility and safety of supervised robotic training for minor general surgical procedures: a prospective single-center study with early learning curve analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Pre-Procedural Robotic Surgery Curricula: A Systematic Review and Thematic Meta-Synthesis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Review
- Development of a procedure specific and skill based robotic-assisted surgical training program for residents: Delphi study identifying key steps and required skill levels for teaching the low-anterior resection.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery at the operational level: an investigation of surgeons' perspectives.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Integration of robotics as standard surgical procedure during residency training for visceral surgery using a balanced scorecard (BSC).Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- [Development and implementation of a structured training program in robotic surgery : The first step is always the hardest].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Quality over quantity-current challenges of robotic surgery in Poland.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Impact of a "Digital Health" Curriculum on Students' Perception About Competence and Relevance of Digital Health Topics for Future Professional Challenges: Prospective Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Modified Delphi Procedure to Achieve Consensus for the Concept of a National Curriculum for Minimally Invasive and Robot-assisted Surgery in Germany (GeRMIQ).Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie · 2025Article
- The impact of standardized robotics course training during colorectal surgery fellowship on post-training practice: a survey of graduates.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- IMRA/SRS Delphi consensus on international standards for common core components of robotic surgical training design.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- The training pathway for residents: 'Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons' (RoCS) does not impair patient outcome during implementation into clinical routine.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- [The new continuing education regulations-A challenge for visceral surgery : Results of a survey among DGAV members and solution strategies of the Young Surgeons].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted procedures gain increasing acceptance for daily surgical routine. However, structured training programs are designed for surgeons with high expertise. Hence, a comprehensive training curriculum was established to ensure a basic competence in robotic abdominal surgery for young surgeons during their residency. The aim of the current work is to propose a feasible and effective training concept. The development process of this training curriculum is based on a comprehensive literature review which led to the concept of "robotic curriculum for young surgeons" (RoCS). It was implemented in the daily routine of a German university hospital starting in 2020. The robotic assessment questionnaire (RAQ) was used for electronic data collection. After the initial phase adjustments, it led to an improvement of the initial version of the curriculum. RoCS is a multimodal training program containing basic training through assistance at the operation table during robotic-assisted operations and basic console training. Key elements are the robotic team time-out (rTTO), perioperative process standardization including feasible personnel scheduling and useful procedure clustering into organ systems, procedural steps and procedural step complexity. Evaluation of standardized communication, performance assessment, patient factors and individual overall workload using NASA Task Load Index is realizable. Flexibility and adaptability to internal organization processes of surgical departments are the main advantages of the concept. RoCS is a strong training tool to meet the specific needs of young surgeons and evaluate their learning success of robotic procedural training. Furthermore, comparison within the different robotic systems should be considered. Further studies are needed to validate a multicenter concept design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.