Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35810226›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Does Residual Cancer Burden Predict Local Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Christine V Pestana, Chad A Livasy, Erin E Donahue, Brittany Neelands, Antoinette R Tan, Terry Sarantou, Lejla Hadzikadic-Gusic, Richard L White

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine V PestanaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Chad A LivasyDepartment of Pathology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Erin E DonahueDepartment of Cancer Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Brittany NeelandsDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Antoinette R TanDepartment of Solid Tumor and Investigational Therapeutics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Terry SarantouDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Lejla Hadzikadic-GusicDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Richard L WhiteDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA. Richard.white@atriumhealth.org.
Levine Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe extent of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can be quantified by the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB), a prognostic tool used to estimate survival outcomes in breast cancer. This study investigated the association between RCB and locoregional recurrence (LRR).

methodsThe study reviewed 532 women with breast cancer who underwent NAC between 2010 and 2016. Relapse in the ipsilateral breast, skin/subcutis at the surgical site, chest wall, pectoralis, or regional lymph nodes defined an LRR. The LRR cumulative incidence (LRCI) was estimated using the Fine and Gray competing-risks model, with death and distant recurrence defined as competing events. The association of LRCI with prognostic variables was evaluated.

resultsOverall, 5.5% of the patients experienced an LRR after a median follow-up period of 65 months. The 5-year LRCI rates by RCB were as follows: RCB-0 (0.9%), RCB-1 (3.2%), RCB-2 (6.0%), and RCB-3 (12.9%). In the univariable analysis, LRCI varied significantly by RCB (p = 0.010). The multivariable analysis showed a significant association of LRCI with increasing RCB, and the patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) phenotype were at lower risk for LRR than those with HER2+ and triple-negative cancers (p < 0.032). The patients with RCB-3 were at a higher risk for local relapse than those with RCB-0 (hazard ratio, 13.78; confidence interval, 2.25-84.45; p = 0.04). Type of operation (p = 0.04) and use of adjuvant radiation (p = 0.046) were statistically significant in the multivariable model.

conclusionsThe study results demonstrate a significant association between LRCI and increasing RCB, although distant recurrence is a substantial driver of disease outcomes. Future prospective studies should examine the role of RCB in clinical decisions regarding indications for adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualProspective StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID35810226
OpenAlexW4284989204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.