ArticleScientific reports2022
Age group prediction with panoramic radiomorphometric parameters using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiographic diagnosis of periodontitis using artificial intelligence: a meta-analysis comparing binary and staging classifications across imaging modalities.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in age and sex determination using maxillofacial radiographs: A systematic review.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2024Pooled it
- Automated prediction of hand-wrist maturation stage from lateral cephalometric and panoramic radiographs using a deep learning approach.European journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine learning approach for adult age estimation using dental characteristics on panoramic radiographs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based dental age estimation in adolescents using panoramic radiographs: a comparative study with traditional methods.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an age estimation model based on dental characteristics using panoramic radiographs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dental age prediction from panoramic radiographs using machine learning techniques.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Forensic dental age estimation with deep learning: a modified xception model for panoramic X-Ray images.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
- Perceived age estimation from facial image and demographic data in young and middle-aged South Korean adults.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of tooth development stages with deep learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Review
- The Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Pedodontics: A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Literature.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- An overview of artificial intelligence based automated diagnosis in paediatric dentistry.Frontiers in oral health · 2024Review
- A machine learning-based predictive model of causality in orthopaedic medical malpractice cases in China.PloS one · 2024Article
- Estimating chronological age through learning local and global features of panoramic radiographs in the Korean population.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Age Group Classification of Dental Radiography without Precise Age Information Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence Its Uses and Application in Pediatric Dentistry: A Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship of 18 radiomorphometric parameters of panoramic radiographs based on age, and to estimate the age group of people with permanent dentition in a non-invasive, comprehensive, and accurate manner using five machine learning algorithms. For the study population (209 men and 262 women; mean age, 32.12 ± 18.71 years), 471 digital panoramic radiographs of Korean individuals were applied. The participants were divided into three groups (with a 20-year age gap) and six groups (with a 10-year age gap), and each age group was estimated using the following five machine learning models: a linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, kernelized support vector machines, multilayer perceptron, and extreme gradient boosting. Finally, a Fisher discriminant analysis was used to visualize the data configuration. In the prediction of the three age-group classification, the areas under the curve (AUCs) obtained for classifying young ages (10-19 years) ranged from 0.85 to 0.88 for five different machine learning models. The AUC values of the older age group (50-69 years) ranged from 0.82 to 0.88, and those of adults (20-49 years) were approximately 0.73. In the six age-group classification, the best scores were also found in age groups 1 (10-19 years) and 6 (60-69 years), with mean AUCs ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 and 80 to 0.90, respectively. A feature analysis based on LDA weights showed that the L-Pulp Area was important for discriminating young ages (10-49 years), and L-Crown, U-Crown, L-Implant, U-Implant, and Periodontitis were used as predictors for discriminating older ages (50-69 years). We established acceptable linear and nonlinear machine learning models for a dental age group estimation using multiple maxillary and mandibular radiomorphometric parameters. Since certain radiomorphological characteristics of young and the elderly were linearly related to age, young and old groups could be easily distinguished from other age groups with automated machine learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.