Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35810213›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Age group prediction with panoramic radiomorphometric parameters using machine learning algorithms.

Yeon-Hee Lee, Jong Hyun Won, Q-Schick Auh, Yung-Kyun Noh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yeon-Hee LeeDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, Kyung Hee University, #26 Kyunghee-daero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Korea. omod0209@gmail.com.
Jong Hyun WonDepartment of Computer Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Q-Schick AuhDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, Kyung Hee University, #26 Kyunghee-daero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Korea.
Yung-Kyun NohDepartment of Computer Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea. nohyung@hanyang.ac.kr.
Hanyang University · KRKyung Hee University Dental Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship of 18 radiomorphometric parameters of panoramic radiographs based on age, and to estimate the age group of people with permanent dentition in a non-invasive, comprehensive, and accurate manner using five machine learning algorithms. For the study population (209 men and 262 women; mean age, 32.12 ± 18.71 years), 471 digital panoramic radiographs of Korean individuals were applied. The participants were divided into three groups (with a 20-year age gap) and six groups (with a 10-year age gap), and each age group was estimated using the following five machine learning models: a linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, kernelized support vector machines, multilayer perceptron, and extreme gradient boosting. Finally, a Fisher discriminant analysis was used to visualize the data configuration. In the prediction of the three age-group classification, the areas under the curve (AUCs) obtained for classifying young ages (10-19 years) ranged from 0.85 to 0.88 for five different machine learning models. The AUC values of the older age group (50-69 years) ranged from 0.82 to 0.88, and those of adults (20-49 years) were approximately 0.73. In the six age-group classification, the best scores were also found in age groups 1 (10-19 years) and 6 (60-69 years), with mean AUCs ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 and 80 to 0.90, respectively. A feature analysis based on LDA weights showed that the L-Pulp Area was important for discriminating young ages (10-49 years), and L-Crown, U-Crown, L-Implant, U-Implant, and Periodontitis were used as predictors for discriminating older ages (50-69 years). We established acceptable linear and nonlinear machine learning models for a dental age group estimation using multiple maxillary and mandibular radiomorphometric parameters. Since certain radiomorphological characteristics of young and the elderly were linearly related to age, young and old groups could be easily distinguished from other age groups with automated machine learning models.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRadiography, PanoramicSupport Vector MachineYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35810213
PMCPMC9271070
OpenAlexW4284961649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.