Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35810200›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2022

Sex differences in appetitive and reactive aggression.

Antonio V Aubry, C Joseph Burnett, Nastacia L Goodwin, Long Li, Jovana Navarrete, Yizhe Zhang, Valerie Tsai, Romain Durand-de Cuttoli, Sam A Golden, Scott J Russo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. On the importance of including both sexes in animal studies - insights from home-cage monitoring.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Neural basis of social hierarchy across species.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Sexual Dimorphism in c-Fos Networks Governing Aggression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hepatoprotective and Antiatherosclerotic Effects of Oleoylethanolamide-Based Dietary Supplement in Dietary-Induced Obesity in Mice.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Irritability in Youths: A Critical Integrative Review.The American journal of psychiatry · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio V Aubry *Nash Family Department of Neuroscience and Brain-Body Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
C Joseph Burnett *Nash Family Department of Neuroscience and Brain-Body Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Nastacia L Goodwin *Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-7491
Long LiNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Brain-Body Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1354-8468
Jovana NavarreteDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Yizhe ZhangFriedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Valerie TsaiDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Romain Durand-de CuttoliNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Brain-Body Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0240-7608
Sam A GoldenDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. sagolden@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-2272
Scott J RussoNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Brain-Body Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. scott.russo@mssm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6470-1805
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

University of Washington Center of Excellence in Opioid Addiction ResearchP30DA048736 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Charles Chavkin · 2019 to 2026
$13.0M
ROLE OF PERIPHERAL IMMUNE-DERIVED MMP8 IN STRESS SUSCEPTIBILITYR01MH104559 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SCOTT JAMES RUSSO · 2014 to 2026
$9.2M
Neural Circuit Mechanisms of Stress-Impaired Social RewardR01MH127820 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RUSSO, SCOTT JAMES · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Role of lateral habenula orexin receptor signaling in aggressive social behaviorR01MH114882 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RUSSO, SCOTT JAMES · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Sex Differences in Neural Circuit Mechanisms of AggressionR01MH133299 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SCOTT JAMES RUSSO · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Rapid and Long-Lasting Antidepressant Action by Targeting Midbrain HCN ChannelsR01MH120637 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RUSSO, SCOTT JAMES · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
Role of VTA-Amygdala Neural Circuit in Mediating Anxiety-Related BehaviorsR01MH120514 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MOREL, CAROLE S, RUSSO, SCOTT JAMES · 2021 to 2022
$847k
Connectomics of relapse to aggression seekingR00DA045662 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOLDEN, SAM · 2019 to 2021
$736k
Dissociable neural mechanisms of reactive versus appetitive aggressionF31MH125587 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOODWIN, NASTACIA · 2021 to 2023
$134k
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA048736NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA045662NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH125587NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104559NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114882NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120514NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120637NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH127820NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH133299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggression is an evolutionarily conserved, adaptive component of social behavior. Studies in male mice illustrate that aggression is influenced by numerous factors including the degree to which an individual finds aggression rewarding and will work for access to attack and subordinate mice. While such studies have expanded our understanding of the molecular and circuit mechanisms of male aggression very little is known about female aggression, within these established contexts. Here we use an ethologically relevant model of male vs. female aggression by pair housing adult male and female outbred CFW mice with opposite sex cage mates. We assess reactive (defensive) aggression in the resident intruder (RI) test and appetitive (rewarding) aggression in the aggression conditioned place preference (CPP) and operant self-administration (SA) tests. Our results show dramatic sex differences in both qualitative and quantitative aspects of reactive vs. appetitive aggression. Males exhibit more wrestling and less investigative behavior during RI, find aggression rewarding, and will work for access to a subordinate to attack. Females exhibit more bites, alternate between aggressive behaviors and investigative behaviors more readily during RI, however, they do not find aggression to be rewarding or reinforcing. These results establish sex differences in aggression in mice, providing an important resource for the field to better understand the circuit and molecular mechanisms of aggression in both sexes.

Indexed as

AggressionSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceRewardSelf AdministrationSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID35810200
PMCPMC9372130
OpenAlexW4284968585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.