Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35809851›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology2022

Intimate Partner Violence and Contraception among Adolescent Girls and Young Women: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Girl Power-Malawi Cohort.

Sara J Grundy, Suzanne Maman, Lauren Graybill, Twambilile Phanga, Dhrutika Vansia, Tiyamike Nthani, Jennifer H Tang, Linda-Gail Bekker, Audrey Pettifor, Nora E Rosenberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sara J GrundyDuke University, School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 530 Foster St., Apt 407, Durham, NC 27701, United States. Electronic address: sara.grundy@duke.edu.
Suzanne MamanDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 530 Foster St., Apt 407, Durham, NC 27701, United States.
Lauren GraybillDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 530 Foster St., Apt 407, Durham, NC 27701, United States.
Twambilile PhangaUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Dhrutika VansiaUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Tiyamike NthaniUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Jennifer H TangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Linda-Gail BekkerUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Audrey PettiforUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Nora E RosenbergDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 530 Foster St., Apt 407, Durham, NC 27701, United States; UNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Developing and Assessing a Male Engagement Intervention for Option B+ in MalawiR00MH104154 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROSENBERG, NORA · 2017 to 2019
$746k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH104154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn sub-Saharan Africa, sexually active adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) experience high rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) and low levels of contraceptive use, but the effect of IPV on contraceptive use is not well understood.

methodsIn the Girl Power-Malawi study, AGYW aged 15-24 were recruited from 4 health centers in Lilongwe, Malawi, and followed for 1 year. At baseline, AGYW were assessed for IPV using the modified Conflict Tactics Scale. AGYW reported contraceptive method use at 6 and 12 months, characterized as barrier, non-barrier, or any modern method. Modified Poisson regression was implemented to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to examine the effect of IPV on contraceptive use.

resultsOne thousand AGYW were enrolled, and 954 non-pregnant participants were included. Baseline prevalence of IPV with the most recent partner was 35.5% (physical), 46.2% (sexual), and 76.9% (emotional). Baseline IPV did not affect contraceptive use at 6 months (aRR [95% CI]: physical 0.98 [0.91-1.05]; sexual 1.00 [0.94-1.07]; emotional 1.03 [0.94-1.12]) or 12 months (physical 0.95 [0.89-1.02]; sexual 0.96 [0.90-1.02]; emotional 0.98 [0.91-1.05]). None of the 3 IPV categories affected contraceptive use when the outcome was restricted to either barrier or non-barrier methods.

conclusionsIn this cohort, IPV was not a key driver of contraceptive use in longitudinal analyses. Interventions are needed to address the alarming rates of IPV in this population, but addressing IPV alone might be insufficient to address low contraceptive use, and multifaceted youth-friendly health services might be necessary.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceAdolescentContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsFemaleHumansMalawiRisk FactorsContraceptive AgentsAdolescent healthContraceptionGlobal healthIntimate partner violenceReproductive health services

Identifiers

PMID35809851
PMCPMC10071546
OpenAlexW4284989342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.