Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35809475›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2022

Age differences in the behavioural economics of cannabis use: Do adolescents and adults differ on demand for cannabis and discounting of future reward?

A Borissova, S Soni, E R Aston, R Lees, K Petrilli, M B Wall, M A P Bloomfield, E Mertzani, A Paksina, T P Freeman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Estimating Price Elasticity of Cannabis Use Among U.S. Adolescents: Evidence From States With Recreational Cannabis Commercialization.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

A BorissovaClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: anya.borissova@kcl.ac.uk.
S SoniClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
E R AstonCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
R LeesAddiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
K PetrilliAddiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
M B WallClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Invicro London, Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, United Kingdom.
M A P BloomfieldClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom; NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Research Department of Mental Health Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Psychiatric Imaging Group, Medical Research Council London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
E MertzaniClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
A PaksinaClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
T P FreemanClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
C MokryszClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
W LawnClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom; National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
H V CurranClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Using wearables and EMA to examine the links between cannabis and depressionP20GM130414 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Jasjit Singh Ahluwalia · 2019 to 2026
$22.0M
Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/P012728/1NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescence is a period of psychological and neural development in which harms associated with cannabis use may be heightened. We hypothesised that adolescent who use cannabis (adolescentsWUC) would have steeper delay discounting (preference for immediate over future rewards) and greater demand (relative valuation) for cannabis than adults who use cannabis (adultsWUC).

methodsThis cross-sectional study, part of the 'CannTeen' project, compared adultsWUC (n = 71, 26-29 years old) and adolescentsWUC (n = 76, 16-17 years old), and gender- and age-matched adolescent (n = 63) and adult (n = 64) controls. AdolescentsWUC and adultsWUC used cannabis 1-7 days/week and were matched on cannabis use frequency (4 days/week). The Monetary Choice Questionnaire assessed delay discounting. A modified Marijuana Purchase Task (MPT) assessed cannabis demand in adolescentsWUC and adultsWUC. The MPT yielded five indices: intensity (amount of cannabis used at zero cost), O

resultsBoth adolescentsWUC and adultsWUC had steeper delay discounting than controls (F, (1,254)= 9.13, p = 0.003, η

conclusionIndividuals who use cannabis prefer immediate rewards more than controls. AdolescentsWUC, compared to adultsWUC, may be in a high-risk category with diminished sensitivity to cannabis price increases and a greater consumption of cannabis when it is free.

Indexed as

CannabisDelay DiscountingMarijuana SmokingAdolescentAdultAnalgesicsCross-Sectional StudiesEconomics, BehavioralHumansRewardAnalgesicsAdolescentCannabisDelay discountingMarijuana purchase task

Identifiers

PMID35809475
PMCPMC10276652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.