Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35809233›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental dental research2022

Treatment of cracked teeth: A comprehensive narrative review.

Angeliki Kakka, Dimitrios Gavriil, John Whitworth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Diagnostic Accuracy of Methods Used to Detect Cracked Teeth.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Treatment of cracked teeth: A comprehensive narrative review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angeliki KakkaDental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6788-6243
Dimitrios GavriilMClinDent Restorative Dentistry, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7939-4430
John WhitworthNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe term "cracked tooth" is used to describe an incomplete fracture initiated from the crown and progressing towards a subgingival direction. Despite the high prevalence of cracked teeth and their frequent association with symptoms and pulpal or periapical pathoses, there is still no consensus in the literature with regard to their restorative and endodontic management. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review was to evaluate the most relevant research and provide an up-to-date comprehensive overview regarding the treatment of cracked teeth. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn electronic literature search was carried out in MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science as well as several "Grey literature" sources up to February 22nd 2022 using a combination of pre-specified 'free-text' terms (keywords) and "subject headings." The search process was supplemented by handsearching in relevant dental journals and reference lists. This narrative review focused on clinical follow-up studies (observational or interventional studies, case series/reports), laboratory studies and systematic reviews written in English language that reported data on treatment of permanent cracked teeth. The selection of relevant studies was carried out by two reviewers (AK and DG) working independently in two consecutive stages: title/abstract screening and full-text retrieval. Any discrepancies in the study selection were resolved by discussion between the reviewers.

resultsIn total, 64 articles were selected for inclusion in this narrative review.

conclusionsCracked teeth with normal pulp or reversible pulpitis have exhibited high pulp and tooth survival rates by the provision of direct or indirect composite restorations. Besides, recent data favour monitoring, especially in the absence of symptoms or compromised tooth structure. When endodontic intervention is required, current evidence suggests that along with appropriate restorative management, outcomes of cracked teeth may be comparable to those of non-cracked root filled teeth.

Indexed as

Cracked Tooth SyndromeDental Restoration, PermanentCrownsDental PulpHumansTooth Rootcomposite resinscracked tooth syndromedental onlaydental restoration failure

Identifiers

PMID35809233
PMCPMC9562569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.