Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35809208›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2022

Elite Bradyrhizobium strains boost biological nitrogen fixation and peanut yield in tropical drylands.

Raphael Silva Jovino, Thaíse Rosa da Silva, Ruth Terezinha Rodrigues, Jackson Rafael de Sá Carvalho, Jussara Barboza de Alencar Cunha, Liziane Maria de Lima, Roseane Cavalcanti Dos Santos, Carolina Etienne de Rosália E Silva Santos, Paula Rose de Almeida Ribeiro, Ana Dolores Santiago de Freitas and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Isolation and Identification ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Raphael Silva JovinoUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), PB, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Thaíse Rosa da SilvaColegiado de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (Univasf), PA, Petrolina, Brazil.
Ruth Terezinha RodriguesColegiado de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (Univasf), PA, Petrolina, Brazil.
Jackson Rafael de Sá CarvalhoDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS), Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil.
Jussara Barboza de Alencar CunhaDepartamento de Tecnologia e Ciências Sociais, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Juazeiro, BA, Brazil.
Liziane Maria de LimaEmbrapa Algodão, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil.
Roseane Cavalcanti Dos SantosEmbrapa Algodão, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil.
Carolina Etienne de Rosália E Silva SantosDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Paula Rose de Almeida RibeiroFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Pernambuco (Facepe), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Ana Dolores Santiago de FreitasDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Lindete Míria Vieira MartinsDepartamento de Tecnologia e Ciências Sociais, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Juazeiro, BA, Brazil.
Paulo Ivan Fernandes-JúniorEmbrapa Semiárido, BR 428, Km 152, Zona Rural, CP 23, Petrolina, PE, CEP: 56302-970, Brazil. paulo.ivan@embrapa.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6390-3720

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 306812/2018-5Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 311218/2017-2Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 316042/2020-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 465133/2014-4Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária 23.16.05.016.00.00Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco APQ 0271-5.01/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important crop for the family-based systems in the tropics, mainly in Brazil. In the Brazilian drylands, peanuts are cropped in low technological systems, and cheap and efficient technologies are needed to improve crop yield and sustainability. Despite this importance, few data are available on selecting efficient peanut rhizobia in experiments under different edaphoclimatic conditions. This work evaluated the agronomic efficiency and the biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) by two elite Bradyrhizobium strains under four different fields in the Brazilian semiarid region. We compared a new efficient strain Bradyrhizobium sp. ESA 123 with the reference strain B. elkanii SEMIA 6144, currently used in peanut rhizobial inoculants in Brazil. Besides the inoculated treatments, two uninoculated controls were assessed (with and without 80 kg ha

Indexed as

BradyrhizobiumFabaceaeArachisBrazilNitrogen FixationSymbiosisArachis hypogaeaInoculantRhizobiaSeed inoculationStrain selection

Identifiers

PMID35809208
PMCPMC9433618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.