Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35809192›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2022

Digital Eye Strain- A Comprehensive Review.

Kirandeep Kaur, Bharat Gurnani, Swatishree Nayak, Nilutparna Deori, Savleen Kaur, Jitendra Jethani, Digvijay Singh, Sumita Agarkar, Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen, Jaspreet Sukhija and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07488208 (Crossover Comparison of Two Novel Stenfilcon A Contact Lens Designs), which is not on this map. Cited by 101 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07488208 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Crossover Comparison of Two Novel Stenfilcon A Contact Lens Designs

TypeinterventionalSponsorSouthern College of OptometryRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsComputer Vision Syndrome, AccommodationArmsStenfilcon A contact lens designs with and without Digital Boost technology that incorporate a 0.3D add power into the lens
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Can Rhodiola rosea supplementation mitigate digital eye strain? A triple-blinded placebo-controlled study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  7. Immediate Effects of Light Mode and Dark Mode Features on Visual Fatigue in Tablet Users.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Mapping the NEI-VFQ-25 scores to the EQ-5D-Y-3L and CHU-9D utility values among adolescents with myopia.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The hidden cost of precision: ergonomic strain, wellness, and career longevity in otolaryngology.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Digital Eye Strain from Digital Device Usage Among University Students: Prevalence and Associated Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kirandeep KaurAravind Eye Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, 605007, India. beingkirandeep@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-7415
Bharat GurnaniAravind Eye Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, 605007, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0848-5172
Swatishree NayakDepartment of Ophthalmology, AIIMS, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1411-2698
Nilutparna DeoriSri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati, Assam, 781028, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-1351
Savleen KaurAdvanced Eye Center, Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Chandigarh, 160012, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1929-4451
Jitendra JethaniBaroda Children Eye Care and Squint Clinic, Vadodara, Gujarat, 390007, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-8306
Digvijay SinghNoble Eye Care, Gurugram, 70058, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8561-9317
Sumita AgarkarDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Adult Strabismus, Sankara Nethralaya, 18 College Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600006, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3557-6312
Jameel Rizwana HussaindeenSankara Nethralaya, 18 College Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600006, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-5251
Jaspreet SukhijaAdvanced Eye Center, Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Chandigarh, 160012, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7012-7619
Deepak MishraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3873-9527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital eye strain (DES) is an entity encompassing visual and ocular symptoms arising due to the prolonged use of digital electronic devices. It is characterized by dry eyes, itching, foreign body sensation, watering, blurring of vision, and headache. Non-ocular symptoms associated with eye strain include stiff neck, general fatigue, headache, and backache. A variable prevalence ranging from 5 to 65% has been reported in the pre-COVID-19 era. With lockdown restrictions during the pandemic, outdoor activities were restricted for all age groups, and digital learning became the norm for almost 2 years. While the DES prevalence amongst children alone rose to 50-60%, the symptoms expanded to include recent onset esotropia and vergence abnormalities as part of the DES spectrum. New-onset myopia and increased progression of existing myopia became one of the most significant ocular health complications. Management options for DES include following correct ergonomics like reducing average daily screen time, frequent blinking, improving lighting, minimizing glare, taking regular breaks from the screen, changing focus to distance object intermittently, and following the 20-20-20 rule to reduce eye strain. Innovations in this field include high-resolution screens, inbuilt antireflective coating, matte-finished glass, edge-to-edge displays, and image smoothening graphic effects. Further explorations should focus on recommendations for digital screen optimization, novel spectacle lens technologies, and inbuilt filters to optimize visual comfort. A paradigm shift is required in our understanding of looking at DES from an etiological perspective, so that customized solutions can be explored accordingly. The aim of this review article is to understand the pathophysiology of varied manifestations, predisposing risk factors, varied management options, along with changing patterns of DES prevalence post COVID-19.

Indexed as

AccommodationConvergenceCOVID-19Digital eye strainDigital revolutionOnline classesPre-COVID-19 eraSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID35809192
PMCPMC9434525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.