Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35809116›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2023

Inequity in psychiatric healthcare use in Australia.

Rubayyat Hashmi, Khorshed Alam, Jeff Gow, Khurshid Alam, Sonja March

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rubayyat HashmiCentre for Health Research, and School of Business, Faculty of Business, Education, Law and Arts, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia. Rubayyat.Hashmi@usq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5953-0650
Khorshed AlamCentre for Health Research, and School of Business, Faculty of Business, Education, Law and Arts, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2232-0745
Jeff GowCentre for Health Research, and School of Business, Faculty of Business, Education, Law and Arts, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5726-298X
Khurshid AlamMurdoch Business School, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7402-7519
Sonja MarchCentre for Health Research and School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, 4300, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8425-7126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite recent substantial mental healthcare reforms to increase the supply of healthcare, mental health inequality in Australia is rising. Understanding of the level of inequity (unmet need gap) in psychiatric service use in Australia's mixed public-private health care system is lacking.

objectiveTo present a novel method to measure inequity in the delivery of psychiatric care.

methodsData came from wave 9 (year 2009, n = 11,563) and wave 17 (year 2017, n = 16,194) of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey. Multiple logistic regression was employed to estimate the psychiatric care utilisation compared to its need and the Gini index was used to estimate the standardised distribution of utilisation to measure the extent of inequity.

resultsThe results show the inequity indices (need-standardised Gini) in psychiatric care utilisation were significant and found to be 0.066 and 0.096 in 2009 and 2017, respectively, for all individuals. In 2009, the inequity indices were found to be 0.051 and 0.078 for males and females, respectively, and 0.045 and 0.068 for rural and urban residents, respectively. In 2017, the indices were calculated to be 0.081 and 0.109 for males and females, respectively, and 0.086 and 0.097 for rural and urban residents, respectively.

conclusionsThis study showed a marked increase in unmet needs in psychiatric care utilisation since 2009. There is a greater need to develop policies to improve equity in psychiatric care utilisation in Australia.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesIncomeDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansLogistic ModelsMaleSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesGINIInequityMental healthNeed factors

Identifiers

PMID35809116
PMCPMC10066087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.