ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
Automated development of the contrast-detail curve based on statistical low-contrast detectability in CT images.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of image quality and detectability in computed tomography: Inter-laboratory comparison of Fourier-based metrics.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Hybrid LiDAR-RGB 3D surface reconstruction for collision avoidance in radiotherapy: a proof‑of‑concept phantom study.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Signal Perception in Two-Dimensional Mapping Techniques: Just Noticeable Difference as a Visual Limit of Detection.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Automated Task-Transfer Function Measurement for CT Image Quality Assessment Based on AAPM TG 233.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Performance of A Statistical-Based Automatic Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Measurement on Images of the ACR CT Phantom.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Automated development of the contrast-detail curve based on statistical low-contrast detectability in CT images.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- A Practical Method for Slice Spacing Measurement Using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Computed Tomography Performance Phantom.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe have developed a software to automatically find the contrast-detail (C-D) curve based on the statistical low-contrast detectability (LCD) in images of computed tomography (CT) phantoms at multiple cell sizes and to generate minimum detectable contrast (MDC) characteristics.
methodsA simple graphical user interface was developed to set the initial parameters needed to create multiple grid region of interest of various cell sizes with a 2-pixel increment. For each cell in the grid, the average CT number was calculated to obtain the standard deviation (SD). Detectability was then calculated by multiplying the SD of the mean CT numbers by 3.29. This process was automatically repeated as many times as the cell size was set at initialization. Based on the obtained LCD, the C-D curve was obtained and the target size at an MDC of 0.6% (i.e., 6-HU difference) was determined. We subsequently investigated the consistency of the target sizes for a 0.6% MDC at four locations within the homogeneous image. We applied the software to images with six noise levels, images of two modules of the American College of Radiology CT phantom, images of four different phantoms, and images of four different CT scanners. We compared the target sizes at a 0.6% MDC based on the statistical LCD and the results from a human observer.
resultsThe developed system was able to measure C-D curves from different phantoms and scanners. We found that the C-D curves follow a power-law fit. We found that higher noise levels resulted in a higher MDC for a target of the same size. The low-contrast module image had a slightly higher MDC than the distance module image. The minimum size of an object detected by visual observation was slightly larger than the size using statistical LCD.
conclusionsThe statistical LCD measurement method can generate a C-D curve automatically, quickly, and objectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.