Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808920›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of health psychology2023

Reasons for using indoor tanning devices: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Martin Eden, Stephanie Lyons, Paul Lorigan, Katherine Payne, Adele C Green, Tracy Epton

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of health psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin EdenManchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1542-2527
Stephanie LyonsManchester Centre for Health Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Paul LoriganCancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Katherine PayneManchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Adele C GreenCancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Tracy EptonManchester Centre for Health Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

the Christie NHS Foundation Trust with the Christie CharityUniversity of Manchester
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite the established causal links to skin cancer, skin ageing and eye inflammation, people continue to use indoor tanning devices (hereafter 'sunbeds'). Understanding the reasons underlying the use of sunbeds is essential for developing effective interventions. The purpose of this study was to collate all existing evidence from qualitative papers published to date that had assessed motivations for using sunbeds.

methodsSix databases were searched from inception to February 2020 for qualitative studies that explored adults' experiences of using sunbeds. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and a narrative evidence synthesis was used to collate findings from each primary study.

resultsUsers of sunbeds were motivated primarily by aesthetic concerns but also by perceived psychological benefits (well-being, confidence and 'fitting in') and physical benefits (improvement in skin conditions such as acne, acquiring vitamin D and preventing sunburn). People also chose indoor tanning over alternatives such as fake tans because they considered the alternatives unacceptable and did not consider indoor tanning a serious health risk. To date, no studies have explored alternatives to meeting non-aesthetic needs related to the use of sunbeds.

conclusionsThis comprehensive explanation for the practice of indoor tanning provides the basis for development of complex interventions to reduce the harm caused by using sunbeds. Effective interventions should include promotion of alternatives, such as different methods of relaxing, to satisfy underlying motivations, changing social norms and correcting misperceptions about health benefits.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsSunbathingAdultHumansMotivationSocial NormsUltraviolet Raysindoor tanning devicesmelanomaqualitative studiesskin cancersystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35808920
PMCPMC10084128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.