Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808809›Full record

ArticleJournal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association2022

Legislation and Policies for the Right to Maternity Protection in South Africa: A Fragmented State of Affairs.

Catherine Pereira-Kotze, Kitty Malherbe, Mieke Faber, Tanya Doherty, Diane Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine Pereira-KotzeSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, , Bellville, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3061-6511
Kitty MalherbeDepartment of Mercantile and Labour Law, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Western Cape, South Africa.
Mieke FaberNon-Communicable Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, Western Cape, South Africa.
Tanya DohertySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, , Bellville, Western Cape, South Africa.
Diane CooperSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, , Bellville, Western Cape, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternity protection rights incorporate comprehensive benefits that should be available to pregnant or breastfeeding working women. RESEARCH

aimTo describe South Africa's maternity protection legal and policy landscape and compare it to global recommendations.

methodA prospective cross-sectional comparative policy analysis was used to review and describe national policy documents published from 1994-2021. Entitlements were mapped and compared to International Labour Organization standards. The document analysis was supplemented by interviews conducted with key national government department informants. Thematic analysis was used to evaluate policy and interview content.

resultsElements of maternity protection policy are incorporated into South Africa's constitutional dispensation, and some measures are consistent with international labor and social security standards. However, the policy framework is fragmented and difficult to interpret. The fragmented policy environment makes it challenging for employees to know their maternity rights' entitlements and for employers to understand their responsibilities. Confusion regarding maternity protection rights is amplified by the complexity of ensuring access to different forms of maternal protection in pre- and postnatal stages, oversight by multiple government departments, and heterogenous working environments.

conclusionsMaternity protection in South Africa is fragmented and difficult to access. Overcoming these challenges requires legislative and implementation measures to ensure greater policy coherence and comprehensive guidance on maternity protection rights. Addressing gaps in maternity protection in South Africa may provide insights for other countries with shortcomings in maternity protection provisions and could contribute to improved breastfeeding practices.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingPolicyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSouth Africabreastfeedingbreastfeeding supportdocument analysislabor rightslactation workplace programslegislationmaternity protectionpolicy analysissocial protectionsocial supportSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID35808809
PMCPMC9596948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.