ArticlePolymers2022
Quality Prediction and Abnormal Processing Parameter Identification in Polypropylene Fiber Melt Spinning Using Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Study and ANN Development for Modeling Tensile and Surface Quality of Fiber-Reinforced Nylon Composites.Polymers · 2025Article
- Machine Learning in Polymeric Technical Textiles: A Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- Influence of Cutting Regime Parameters on Determining the Main Cutting Resistance during Polypropylene Machining.Polymers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melt spinning machines must be set up according to the process parameters that result in the best end product quality. In this study, artificial intelligence algorithms were employed to create a system that detects abnormal processing parameters and suggests strategies to improve quality. Polypropylene (PP) was selected as the experimental material, and the quality achieved by adjusting the melt spinning machine's processing parameter settings was used as the basis for judgement. The processing parameters included screw temperature, gear pump temperature, die head temperature, screw speed, gear pump speed, and take-up speed as the six control factors. The four quality characteristics included fineness, breaking strength, elongation at break, and elastic energy modulus. In the first part of our study, we applied fast deep-learning characteristic grid calculations on a 440-item historical data set to train a deep learning neural network and determine methods for multi-quality optimization. In the second part, with the best processing parameters as a benchmark, and given abnormal quality data derived from processing parameter settings deviating from these optimal values, several machine learning and deep learning methods were compared in their ability to find the settings responsible for the abnormal data, which was randomly split into a 210-item training data set and a 210-item verification data set. The random forest method proved to be the best at identifying responsible parameter settings, with accuracy rates of single and double identification classifications together of 100%, for single factor classification of 98.3%, and for double factor classification of 96.0%, thereby confirming that the diagnostic method proposed in this study can effectively predict product abnormality and find the parameter settings responsible for product abnormality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.