Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808766›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Rheological Behavior and Dynamic Mechanical Properties for Interpretation of Layer Adhesion in FDM 3D Printing.

Supaphorn Thumsorn, Wattanachai Prasong, Takashi Kurose, Akira Ishigami, Yutaka Kobayashi, Hiroshi Ito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Supaphorn ThumsornResearch Center for GREEN Materials and Advanced Processing, Yamagata University, 4-3-16 Jonan, Yamagata 992-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5095-3323
Wattanachai PrasongDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pathumwan Institute of Technology, 833 Rama I Road, Wangmai, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6065-0916
Takashi KuroseResearch Center for GREEN Materials and Advanced Processing, Yamagata University, 4-3-16 Jonan, Yamagata 992-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-9985
Akira IshigamiResearch Center for GREEN Materials and Advanced Processing, Yamagata University, 4-3-16 Jonan, Yamagata 992-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2437-4141
Yutaka KobayashiResearch Center for GREEN Materials and Advanced Processing, Yamagata University, 4-3-16 Jonan, Yamagata 992-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2701-7366
Hiroshi ItoResearch Center for GREEN Materials and Advanced Processing, Yamagata University, 4-3-16 Jonan, Yamagata 992-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8432-8457

Funding

JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas JP18H05483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercial filaments of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) composites with particulate filler, carbon fiber, and copper powder with different contents were fabricated by FDM 3D printing in XZ-direction at bed temperatures of 45 °C and 60 °C. The effects of additives and bed temperatures on layer adhesion, fracture behavior, and mechanical performance of the PLA composites 3D printing were evaluated. Rheological properties informed viscous nature of all filaments and interface bonding in the PLA composites, which improved printability and dimensional stability of the 3D printing. Crystallinity of the PLA composites 3D printing increased with increasing bed temperature resulting in an improvement of storage modulus, tensile, and flexural properties. On the contrary, the ductility of the 3D printing was raised when printed at low bed temperature. Dynamic mechanical properties, the degree of entanglement, the adhesion factor, the effectiveness coefficient, the reinforcing efficiency factor, and the Cole-Cole analysis were used to understand the layer adhesion, and the interfacial interaction of the composites as compared to the compression molded sheets. SEM images revealed good adhesion between the additives and the PLA matrix. However, the additives induced faster solidification and showed larger voids in the 3D printing, which indicated lower layer adhesion as compared to neat PLA. It can be noted that the combination of the additives and the optimized 3D printing conditions would be obtain superior mechanical performance even layer adhesion has been restricted.

Indexed as

3D printingcompositedynamic mechanical analysislayer adhesionmorphology

Identifiers

PMID35808766
PMCPMC9268954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.