ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
An Automatic System for Continuous Pain Intensity Monitoring Based on Analyzing Data from Uni-, Bi-, and Multi-Modality.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated Vision-Based Sensing of Paediatric Pain Using 2D-Facial Landmark Trajectories Derived from 3D Geometric Normalisation and a Spatial-Temporal Attention Long Short-Term Memory (STA-LSTM) Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pain assessment using physiological responses/markers in different types of pain: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Zero-shot multimodal pain estimation via synthetic pain simulation and domain-invariant learning.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Review
- Pseudo-labeling based adaptations of pain domain classifiers.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Automated Electrodermal Activity and Facial Expression Analysis for Continuous Pain Intensity Monitoring on the X-ITE Pain Database.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A systematic review of neurophysiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Digital Biomarker Applications Across the Spectrum of Opioid Use Disorder.Cogent mental health · 2023Article
- Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pain is a reliable indicator of health issues; it affects patients' quality of life when not well managed. The current methods in the clinical application undergo biases and errors; moreover, such methods do not facilitate continuous pain monitoring. For this purpose, the recent methodologies in automatic pain assessment were introduced, which demonstrated the possibility for objectively and robustly measuring and monitoring pain when using behavioral cues and physiological signals. This paper focuses on introducing a reliable automatic system for continuous monitoring of pain intensity by analyzing behavioral cues, such as facial expressions and audio, and physiological signals, such as electrocardiogram (ECG), electromyogram (EMG), and electrodermal activity (EDA) from the X-ITE Pain Dataset. Several experiments were conducted with 11 datasets regarding classification and regression; these datasets were obtained from the database to reduce the impact of the imbalanced database problem. With each single modality (Uni-modality) experiment, we used a Random Forest [RF] baseline method, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) method, and a LSTM using a sample weighting method (called LSTM-SW). Further, LSTM and LSTM-SW were used with fused modalities (two modalities = Bi-modality and all modalities = Multi-modality) experiments. Sample weighting was used to downweight misclassified samples during training to improve the performance. The experiments' results confirmed that regression is better than classification with imbalanced datasets, EDA is the best single modality, and fused modalities improved the performance significantly over the single modality in 10 out of 11 datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.