Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808487›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

An Automatic System for Continuous Pain Intensity Monitoring Based on Analyzing Data from Uni-, Bi-, and Multi-Modality.

Ehsan Othman, Philipp Werner, Frerk Saxen, Marc-André Fiedler, Ayoub Al-Hamadi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pseudo-labeling based adaptations of pain domain classifiers.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ehsan OthmanDepartment of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4738-1897
Philipp WernerDepartment of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4762-2926
Frerk SaxenDepartment of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Marc-André FiedlerDepartment of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5606-4033
Ayoub Al-HamadiDepartment of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3632-2402
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DE

Funding

DFG vital parameters AL 638/14-1Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany BMBF; Robo-Lab no. 03ZZ04X02BGerman Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) 91525164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is a reliable indicator of health issues; it affects patients' quality of life when not well managed. The current methods in the clinical application undergo biases and errors; moreover, such methods do not facilitate continuous pain monitoring. For this purpose, the recent methodologies in automatic pain assessment were introduced, which demonstrated the possibility for objectively and robustly measuring and monitoring pain when using behavioral cues and physiological signals. This paper focuses on introducing a reliable automatic system for continuous monitoring of pain intensity by analyzing behavioral cues, such as facial expressions and audio, and physiological signals, such as electrocardiogram (ECG), electromyogram (EMG), and electrodermal activity (EDA) from the X-ITE Pain Dataset. Several experiments were conducted with 11 datasets regarding classification and regression; these datasets were obtained from the database to reduce the impact of the imbalanced database problem. With each single modality (Uni-modality) experiment, we used a Random Forest [RF] baseline method, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) method, and a LSTM using a sample weighting method (called LSTM-SW). Further, LSTM and LSTM-SW were used with fused modalities (two modalities = Bi-modality and all modalities = Multi-modality) experiments. Sample weighting was used to downweight misclassified samples during training to improve the performance. The experiments' results confirmed that regression is better than classification with imbalanced datasets, EDA is the best single modality, and fused modalities improved the performance significantly over the single modality in 10 out of 11 datasets.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerQuality of LifeElectrocardiographyHumansPainPain Measurementcontinuous pain intensity monitoringelectrocardiogramelectrodermal activityelectromyogramfacial expressionsfused modalitieslong short-term memory networkrandom forestsample weighting

Identifiers

PMID35808487
PMCPMC9269799
OpenAlexW4283820653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.