Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808470›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

System Comparison for Gait and Balance Monitoring Used for the Evaluation of a Home-Based Training.

Clara Rentz, Mehran Sahandi Far, Maik Boltes, Alfons Schnitzler, Katrin Amunts, Juergen Dukart, Martina Minnerop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clara RentzInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Juelich, 52428 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6636-2184
Mehran Sahandi FarInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Juelich, 52428 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5311-8286
Maik BoltesInstitute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-7), Research Centre Juelich, 52428 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-896X
Alfons SchnitzlerDepartment of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-7939
Katrin AmuntsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Juelich, 52428 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5828-0867
Juergen DukartInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Juelich, 52428 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0492-5644
Martina MinneropInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Juelich, 52428 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1365-5236
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are currently no standard methods for evaluating gait and balance performance at home. Smartphones include acceleration sensors and may represent a promising and easily accessible tool for this purpose. We performed an interventional feasibility study and compared a smartphone-based approach with two standard gait analysis systems (force plate and motion capturing systems). Healthy adults (

Indexed as

GaitSmartphoneAdultHumansMechanical PhenomenaPostural Balancebalancebiomarkersgaithome-basedIMUmotion capturingsmartphonetrainingvideo-based

Identifiers

PMID35808470
PMCPMC9269735
OpenAlexW4283752648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.