Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808458›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Predicting Patient Length of Stay in Australian Emergency Departments Using Data Mining.

Sai Gayatri Gurazada, Shijia Caddie Gao, Frada Burstein, Paul Buntine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances in E-Health and Mobile Health Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sai Gayatri GurazadaFaculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Shijia Caddie GaoFaculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1518-1724
Frada BursteinFaculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-0878
Paul BuntineEastern Health Clinical School Monash University, Box Hill, Melbourne, VIC 3128, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4329-3117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Length of Stay (LOS) is an important performance metric in Australian Emergency Departments (EDs). Recent evidence suggests that an LOS in excess of 4 h may be associated with increased mortality, but despite this, the average LOS continues to remain greater than 4 h in many EDs. Previous studies have found that Data Mining (DM) can be used to help hospitals to manage this metric and there is continued research into identifying factors that cause delays in ED LOS. Despite this, there is still a lack of specific research into how DM could use these factors to manage ED LOS. This study adds to the emerging literature and offers evidence that it is possible to predict delays in ED LOS to offer Clinical Decision Support (CDS) by using DM. Sixteen potentially relevant factors that impact ED LOS were identified through a literature survey and subsequently used as predictors to create six Data Mining Models (DMMs). An extract based on the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) was used to obtain relevant patient details and the DMMs were implemented using the Weka Software. The DMMs implemented in this study were successful in identifying the factors that were most likely to cause ED LOS > 4 h and also identify their correlation. These DMMs can be used by hospitals, not only to identify risk factors in their EDs that could lead to ED LOS > 4 h, but also to monitor these factors over time.

Indexed as

Data MiningEmergency Service, HospitalAustraliaHumansLength of StayRetrospective Studiesclinical decision supportdata mining modelsemergency departmentlength of staypredictive data miningWeka

Identifiers

PMID35808458
PMCPMC9269793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.