Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808457›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparative Analysis of Major Machine-Learning-Based Path Loss Models for Enclosed Indoor Channels.

Mohamed K Elmezughi, Omran Salih, Thomas J Afullo, Kevin J Duffy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamed K ElmezughiThe Discipline of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa.
Omran SalihInstitute of Systems Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7861-5502
Thomas J AfulloThe Discipline of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2710-4577
Kevin J DuffyInstitute of Systems Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlimited access to information and data sharing wherever and at any time for anyone and anything is a fundamental component of fifth-generation (5G) wireless communication and beyond. Therefore, it has become inevitable to exploit the super-high frequency (SHF) and millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequency bands for future wireless networks due to their attractive ability to provide extremely high data rates because of the availability of vast amounts of bandwidth. However, due to the characteristics and sensitivity of wireless signals to the propagation effects in these frequency bands, more accurate path loss prediction models are vital for the planning, evaluating, and optimizing future wireless communication networks. This paper presents and evaluates the performance of several well-known machine learning methods, including multiple linear regression (MLR), polynomial regression (PR), support vector regression (SVR), as well as the methods using decision trees (DT), random forests (RF), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural networks (ANN), and artificial recurrent neural networks (RNN). RNNs are mainly based on long short-term memory (LSTM). The models are compared based on measurement data to provide the best fitting machine-learning-based path loss prediction models. The main results obtained from this study show that the best root-mean-square error (RMSE) performance is given by the ANN and RNN-LSTM methods, while the worst is for the MLR method. All the RMSE values for the given learning techniques are in the range of 0.0216 to 2.9008 dB. Furthermore, this work shows that the models (except for the MLR model) perform excellently in fitting actual measurement data for wireless communications in enclosed indoor environments since they provide R-squared and correlation values higher than 0.91 and 0.96, respectively. The paper shows that these learning methods could be used as accurate and stable models for predicting path loss in the mmWave frequency regime.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsForecastingLinear Models5G6Gchannel modelingmachine learningneural networkpath losspropagation characteristicsrandom forestregressionwireless communications

Identifiers

PMID35808457
PMCPMC9269839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.