Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808456›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Flexible Machine Learning Algorithms for Clinical Gait Assessment Tools.

Christian Greve, Hobey Tam, Manfred Grabherr, Aditya Ramesh, Bart Scheerder, Juha M Hijmans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Automatic gait analysis in canines using computer vision.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian GreveDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hobey TamOro Muscles B.V., 9715 CJ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Manfred GrabherrOro Muscles B.V., 9715 CJ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8792-6508
Aditya RameshDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6270-3295
Bart ScheerderCenter for Development and Innovation (CDI), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Juha M HijmansDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current gold standard of gait diagnostics is dependent on large, expensive motion-capture laboratories and highly trained clinical and technical staff. Wearable sensor systems combined with machine learning may help to improve the accessibility of objective gait assessments in a broad clinical context. However, current algorithms lack flexibility and require large training datasets with tedious manual labelling of data. The current study tests the validity of a novel machine learning algorithm for automated gait partitioning of laboratory-based and sensor-based gait data. The developed artificial intelligence tool was used in patients with a central neurological lesion and severe gait impairments. To build the novel algorithm, 2% and 3% of the entire dataset (567 and 368 steps in total, respectively) were required for assessments with laboratory equipment and inertial measurement units. The mean errors of machine learning-based gait partitions were 0.021 s for the laboratory-based datasets and 0.034 s for the sensor-based datasets. Combining reinforcement learning with a deep neural network allows significant reduction in the size of the training datasets to <5%. The low number of required training data provides end-users with a high degree of flexibility. Non-experts can easily adjust the developed algorithm and modify the training library depending on the measurement system and clinical population.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGaitAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computerclinical gait analysisdeep neural networksgait partitioninginertial measurement unitsmachine learningreinforcement learningsensorswearables

Identifiers

PMID35808456
PMCPMC9269679
OpenAlexW4283749537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.