Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808451›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

ECG Classification Using Orthogonal Matching Pursuit and Machine Learning.

Sandra Śmigiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From Data to Diagnosis: How Machine Learning Is Changing Heart Health Monitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sandra ŚmigielFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2459-5494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health monitoring and related technologies are a rapidly growing area of research. To date, the electrocardiogram (ECG) remains a popular measurement tool in the evaluation and diagnosis of heart disease. The number of solutions involving ECG signal monitoring systems is growing exponentially in the literature. In this article, underestimated Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) algorithms are used, demonstrating the significant effect of concise representation parameters on improving the performance of the classification process. Cardiovascular disease classification models based on classical Machine Learning classifiers were defined and investigated. The study was undertaken on the recently published PTB-XL database, whose ECG signals were previously subjected to detailed analysis. The classification was realized for class 2, class 5, and class 15 cardiac diseases. A new method of detecting R-waves and, based on them, determining the location of QRS complexes was presented. Novel aggregation methods of ECG signal fragments containing QRS segments, necessary for tests for classical classifiers, were developed. As a result, it was proved that ECG signal subjected to algorithms of R wave detection, QRS complexes extraction, and resampling performs very well in classification using Decision Trees. The reason can be found in structuring the signal due to the actions mentioned above. The implementation of classification issues achieved the highest Accuracy of 90.4% in recognition of 2 classes, as compared to less than 78% for 5 classes and 71% for 15 classes.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsArrhythmias, CardiacHumansMachine LearningclassificationDictionary LearningECG signalGabor dictionaryKSVDMachine Learningorthogonal matching pursuitPTB-XL database

Identifiers

PMID35808451
PMCPMC9269846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.