Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808440›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Machine-Learning-Based Analysis of the Relationships between Loneliness Metrics and Mobility Patterns for Elderly.

Aditi Site, Saigopal Vasudevan, Samuel Olaiya Afolaranmi, Jose L Martinez Lastra, Jari Nurmi, Elena Simona Lohan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aditi SiteFaculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9802-2061
Saigopal VasudevanFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4180-7674
Samuel Olaiya AfolaranmiFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-3017
Jose L Martinez LastraFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6227-3408
Jari NurmiFaculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2169-4606
Elena Simona LohanFaculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1718-6924
Tampere University · FI

Funding

The Intelligent Society Platform (INSO) ULTRA (328226, 328214)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness and social isolation are subjective measures associated with the feeling of discomfort and distress. Various factors associated with the feeling of loneliness or social isolation are: the built environment, long-term illnesses, the presence of disabilities or health problems, etc. One of the most important aspect which could impact feelings of loneliness is mobility. In this paper, we present a machine-learning based approach to classify the user loneliness levels using their indoor and outdoor mobility patterns. User mobility data has been collected based on indoor and outdoor sensors carried on by volunteers frequenting an elderly nursing house in Tampere region, Finland. The data was collected using Pozyx sensor for indoor data and Pico minifinder sensor for outdoor data. Mobility patterns such as the distance traveled indoors and outdoors, indoor and outdoor estimated speed, and frequently visited clusters were the most relevant features for classifying the user's perceived loneliness levels.Three types of data used for classification task were indoor data, outdoor data and combined indoor-outdoor data. Indoor data consisted of indoor mobility data and statistical features from accelerometer data, outdoor data consisted of outdoor mobility data and other parameters such as speed recorded from sensors and course of a person whereas combined indoor-outdoor data had common mobility features from both indoor and outdoor data. We found that the machine-learning model based on XGBoost algorithm achieved the highest performance with accuracy between 90% and 98% for indoor, outdoor, and combined indoor-outdoor data. We also found that Lubben-scale based labelling of perceived loneliness works better for both indoor and outdoor data, whereas UCLA scale-based labelling works better with combined indoor-outdoor data.

Indexed as

LonelinessAgedAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningSocial Isolationclassificationindoor mobilitylonelinessLubben scoremachine learningoutdoor mobilityrandom forestsenior citizenssupport vector machinesUCLA scoreXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID35808440
PMCPMC9269697
OpenAlexW4283743639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.