Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35808328›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

An Implementation of Trust Chain Framework with Hierarchical Content Identifier Mechanism by Using Blockchain Technology.

Hsing-Chung Chen, Bambang Irawan, Pei-Yu Hsu, Jhih-Sheng Su, Chun-Wei Jerry Lin, Prayitno, Karisma Trinanda Putra, Cahya Damarjati, Chien-Erh Weng, Yao-Hsien Liang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hsing-Chung ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 413305, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5266-9975
Bambang IrawanDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 413305, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9829-7548
Pei-Yu HsuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 413305, Taiwan.
Jhih-Sheng SuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 413305, Taiwan.
Chun-Wei Jerry LinDepartment of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied, 5063 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8768-9709
PrayitnoDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 413305, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4794-2957
Karisma Trinanda PutraDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Bantul 55183, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-2887-3527
Cahya DamarjatiDepartment of Information Technology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Bantul 55183, Indonesia.
Chien-Erh WengDepartment of Telecommunication Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 81157, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0344-6038
Yao-Hsien LiangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 413305, Taiwan.
Pi-Hsien ChangInformation Management Center, Taichung City Government, Taichung 407610, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in information technology (IT) and operation technology (OT) accelerate the development of manufacturing systems (MS) consisting of integrated circuits (ICs), modules, and systems, toward Industry 4.0. However, the existing MS does not support comprehensive identity forensics for the whole system, limiting its ability to adapt to equipment authentication difficulties. Furthermore, the development of trust imposed during their crosswise collaborations with suppliers and other manufacturers in the supply chain is poorly maintained. In this paper, a trust chain framework with a comprehensive identification mechanism is implemented for the designed MS system, which is based and created on the private blockchain in conjunction with decentralized database systems to boost the flexibility, traceability, and identification of the IC-module-system. Practical implementations are developed using a functional prototype. First, the decentralized application (DApp) and the smart contracts are proposed for constructing the new trust chain under the proposed comprehensive identification mechanism by using blockchain technology. In addition, the blockchain addresses of IC, module, and system are automatically registered to InterPlanetary File System (IPFS), individually. In addition, their corresponding hierarchical CID (content identifier) values are organized by using Merkle DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph), which is employed via the hierarchical content identifier mechanism (HCIDM) proposed in this paper. Based on insights obtained from this analysis, the trust chain based on HCIDM can be applied to any MS system, for example, this trust chain could be used to prevent the counterfeit modules and ICs employed in the monitoring system of a semiconductor factory environment. The evaluation results show that the proposed scheme could work in practice under the much lower costs, compared to the public blockchain, with a total cost of 0.002094 Ether. Finally, this research is developed an innovation trust chain mechanism that could be provided the system-level security for any MS toward Industrial 4.0 in order to meet the requirements of both manufacturing innovation and product innovation in Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Indexed as

BlockchainTechnologyblockchaincomprehensive identification mechanismmanufacturing innovation and product innovationtrust chain framework

Identifiers

PMID35808328
PMCPMC9269561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.