Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807911›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Outcome Evaluation on Impact of the Nutrition Intervention among Adolescents: A Feasibility, Randomised Control Study from Myheart Beat (Malaysian Health and Adolescents Longitudinal Research Team-Behavioural Epidemiology and Trial).

Hazreen Abdul Majid, Ai Kah Ng, Maznah Dahlui, Shooka Mohammadi, Mohd Nahar Azmi Bin Mohamed, Tin Tin Su, Muhammad Yazid Jalaludin

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hazreen Abdul MajidCentre for Population Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2718-8424
Ai Kah NgDivision of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, International Medical University, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-5802
Maznah DahluiCentre for Population Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4923-9410
Shooka MohammadiCentre for Population Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9157-1922
Mohd Nahar Azmi Bin MohamedDepartment of Sports Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Tin Tin SuSouth East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO) & Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Bandar Sunway 47500, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0387-6406
Muhammad Yazid JalaludinDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
University of Malaya · MYAirlangga University · IDIMU University · MY

Funding

Academy of Sciences Malaysia Newton Ungku Omar FundUK Medical Research Council MR/P013821/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A healthy eating environment in the school setting is crucial to nurture the healthy eating pattern for youth. Thus, it helps to combat the obesity issue. However, the impact of healthy school environment on healthy eating habits among Asian adolescents is scarce and less clear. This clustered randomised-control study has two objectives. The first objective was to evaluate the changes in adolescents' dietary intake after the interventions for all arms (control; healthy cooking training only; subsidization with healthy cooking training). The second objective was to compare the effect of subsidization with healthy cooking training and healthy cooking training only with the control arm on adolescents' dietary intakes. This study consisted of 340 secondary school students aged 14 years in rural and urban Malaysia. A total of two arms of intervention and one arm of control were included. Intervention one focused on healthy cooking preparation for the canteen and convenience shop operators. Intervention two included subsidization for fruits and vegetables with a healthy cooking preparation training for the canteen and suggestions on providing healthy options to the convenience shop operators. The outcome measured was changes to dietary intake. It was measured using a three-day dietary history pre- and post-intervention. A paired-

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyVegetablesAdolescentFeasibility StudiesFeeding BehaviorHumansSchoolsadolescentsdietary intakefeasibility studyinterventionrandomised control trial

Identifiers

PMID35807911
PMCPMC9268738
OpenAlexW4283745928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.