Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807827›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Complementary Feeding Caregivers' Practices and Growth, Risk of Overweight/Obesity, and Other Non-Communicable Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Marcello Bergamini, Giovanni Simeone, Maria Carmen Verga, Mattia Doria, Barbara Cuomo, Giuseppe D'Antonio, Iride Dello Iacono, Giuseppe Di Mauro, Lucia Leonardi, Vito Leonardo Miniello and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sharing the motherload: A review and development of the CO-Parent conceptual model for early childhood obesity prevention.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Marcello BergaminiAUSL Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Giovanni SimeoneASL Brindisi, 72023 Mesagne, Brindisi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1724-5210
Maria Carmen VergaASL Salerno, 84019 Vietri Sul Mare, Salerno, Italy.
Mattia DoriaAULSS 3 Serenissima, 30015 Chioggia, Venice, Italy.
Barbara CuomoDepartment of Pediatrics, Belcolle Hospital, 01010 Viterbo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8405-780X
Giuseppe D'AntonioIndependent Researcher, 84100 Salerno, Italy.
Iride Dello IaconoIndependent Researcher, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Giuseppe Di MauroASL Caserta, 81031 Aversa, Caserta, Italy.
Lucia LeonardiMaternal Infantile and Urological Sciences Department, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Vito Leonardo MinielloNutrition Unit, Department of Pediatrics, "Giovanni XXIII" Children Hospital, "Aldo Moro" University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Filomena PalmaASL Salerno, 84091 Battipaglia, Salerno, Italy.
Immacolata ScoteseASL Salerno, 84022 Campagna, Salerno, Italy.
Giovanna TezzaSan Bortolo Hospital, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3066-3940
Margherita CaroliIndependent Researcher, 72021 Francavilla Fontana, Brindisi, Italy.
Andrea VaniaIndependent Researcher, 00162 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6158-2495
University of Salerno · ITIstituto di Istruzione Secondaria Superiore "V. Lilla" Francavilla Fontana - Oria · ITOspedale A. Perrino · ITOspedale di Belcolle · ITOspedale Pediatrico Giovanni XXIII · ITOspedale San Bortolo · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several institutions propose responsive feeding (RF) as the caregivers' relational standard when nurturing a child, from breast/formula feeding onwards. Previous systematic reviews (SRs) on caregivers' feeding practices (CFPs) have included studies on populations from countries with different cultures, rates of malnutrition, and incomes, whereas this SR compares different CFPs only in healthy children (4-24 months) from industrialized countries. Clinical questions were about the influence of different CFPs on several important outcomes, namely growth, overweight/obesity, risk of choking, dental caries, type 2 diabetes (DM2), and hypertension. The literature review does not support any Baby Led Weaning's or Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS' (BLISS) positive influence on children's weight-length gain, nor their preventive effect on future overweight/obesity. RF-CFPs can result in adequate weight gain and a lower incidence of overweight/obesity during the first two years of life, whereas restrictive styles and coercive styles, two kinds of non-RF in CF, can have a negative effect, favoring excess weight and lower weight, respectively. Choking risk: failure to supervise a child's meals by an adult represents the most important risk factor; no cause-effect relation between BLW/BLISS/RF/NRCF and choking could be found. Risks of DM2, hypertension, and caries: different CFPs cannot be considered as a risky or preventive factor for developing these conditions later in life.

Indexed as

Airway ObstructionDental CariesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypertensionNoncommunicable DiseasesCaregiversChildFeeding BehaviorHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaObesityOverweightWeight Gainbaby led weaningBLISSchokingcomplementary feedinggrowthnon-responsive feedingobesityoverweightresponsive feedingweaning

Identifiers

PMID35807827
PMCPMC9268062
OpenAlexW4283590946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.