Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807805›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Understanding Enablers and Barriers to the Implementation of Nutrition Standards in Publicly Funded Institutions in Victoria.

Emalie Rosewarne, Wai-Kwan Chislett, Briar McKenzie, Cliona Ni Mhurchu, Tara Boelsen-Robinson, Miranda Blake, Jacqui Webster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. "Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emalie RosewarneThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5748-3953
Wai-Kwan ChislettThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2006, Australia.
Briar McKenzieThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6972-6617
Cliona Ni MhurchuThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1144-9167
Tara Boelsen-RobinsonGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.
Miranda BlakeGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0649-2320
Jacqui WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2006, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUDeakin University · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Victorian Health Promotion Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective implementation of nutrition standards in publicly funded institutions can facilitate healthy food and beverage consumption by communities and populations, which can enable improvements in dietary intake and reduce disease burden. This study aimed to understand stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of government nutrition standards in publicly funded institutions in the Australian state of Victoria, as well as to determine enablers and barriers to successful implementation. Pre-interview questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered to stakeholders involved in the implementation of nutrition standards in publicly funded institutions in Victoria. The Interactive Systems Framework, which allows understanding of the infrastructure and systems needed to implement policies, was used to design the survey instruments and guide the data analysis. Forty-four stakeholders were interviewed, including program implementers, support personnel and food providers, across public sector hospitals and health services, workplaces, sport and recreation centres and schools. Though translated materials and resources have been developed for end-users to facilitate uptake and implementation, current nutrition standards were perceived to be long and complex, which hindered implementation. The existence of a government-funded implementation support service enabled action by providing technical support, troubleshooting and capacity-building. A specific pathway for successful guideline implementation was determined through the analysis. Opportunities to close the policy-implementation gap were identified. This will be crucial to maximising the impact of nutrition standards on population diets and reducing diet-related disease. Strengthening the guidelines and their governance, streamlining the support system and overcoming barriers within and outside of implementing organisations, are urgently required to propel statewide progress.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusSchoolsAustraliaFoodGovernmentNutrition Policyfood procurementnutrition standardspolicy implementationpublicly funded institutions

Identifiers

PMID35807805
PMCPMC9268167
OpenAlexW4283583598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.