Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807306›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

From Traditional Ethnopharmacology to Modern Natural Drug Discovery: A Methodology Discussion and Specific Examples.

Stergios Pirintsos, Athanasios Panagiotopoulos, Michalis Bariotakis, Vangelis Daskalakis, Christos Lionis, George Sourvinos, Ioannis Karakasiliotis, Marilena Kampa, Elias Castanas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. From traditional remedy toFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cytotoxic and Antimicrobial Activity of theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stergios PirintsosDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences and Technology, University of Crete, 71409 Heraklion, Greece.
Athanasios PanagiotopoulosLaboratory of Experimental Endocrinology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71409 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8015-0484
Michalis BariotakisDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences and Technology, University of Crete, 71409 Heraklion, Greece.
Vangelis DaskalakisDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3603, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-8870-0850
Christos LionisNature Crete Pharmaceuticals, 71305 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9324-2839
George SourvinosNature Crete Pharmaceuticals, 71305 Heraklion, Greece.
Ioannis KarakasiliotisLaboratory of Biology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3004-8104
Marilena KampaNature Crete Pharmaceuticals, 71305 Heraklion, Greece.
Elias CastanasNature Crete Pharmaceuticals, 71305 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-1835

Funding

Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (H.F.R.I.) 3725OLVOS Science SA Private GrantPartnership for Advanced Computing in Europe Grant to VDState Scholarships Foundation (ΙΚΥ) MIS-5000432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethnopharmacology, through the description of the beneficial effects of plants, has provided an early framework for the therapeutic use of natural compounds. Natural products, either in their native form or after crude extraction of their active ingredients, have long been used by different populations and explored as invaluable sources for drug design. The transition from traditional ethnopharmacology to drug discovery has followed a straightforward path, assisted by the evolution of isolation and characterization methods, the increase in computational power, and the development of specific chemoinformatic methods. The deriving extensive exploitation of the natural product chemical space has led to the discovery of novel compounds with pharmaceutical properties, although this was not followed by an analogous increase in novel drugs. In this work, we discuss the evolution of ideas and methods, from traditional ethnopharmacology to in silico drug discovery, applied to natural products. We point out that, in the past, the starting point was the plant itself, identified by sustained ethnopharmacological research, with the active compound deriving after extensive analysis and testing. In contrast, in recent years, the active substance has been pinpointed by computational methods (in silico docking and molecular dynamics, network pharmacology), followed by the identification of the plant(s) containing the active ingredient, identified by existing or putative ethnopharmacological information. We further stress the potential pitfalls of recent in silico methods and discuss the absolute need for in vitro and in vivo validation as an absolute requirement. Finally, we present our contribution to natural products' drug discovery by discussing specific examples, applying the whole continuum of this rapidly evolving field. In detail, we report the isolation of novel antiviral compounds, based on natural products active against influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and novel substances active on a specific GPCR, OXER1.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrug DiscoveryEthnopharmacologyPlantsSARS-CoV-2Biological Productsbioprospectingcomputational chemistrydrug discoveryethnopharmacologyexperimental screeningin silico screeningpharmacological testingplants

Identifiers

PMID35807306
PMCPMC9268545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.