Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807195›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology-A Narrative Review of Current Status.

George Koulaouzidis, Tomasz Jadczyk, Dimitris K Iakovidis, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Marc Bisnaire, Dafni Charisopoulou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Healthcare delivery in the arctic-telehealth prospects.International journal of circumpolar health · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

George KoulaouzidisDepartment of Biochemical Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University (PMU), 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Tomasz JadczykDivision of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, 40-551 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7955-9100
Dimitris K IakovidisDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, 40500 Lamia, Greece.
Anastasios KoulaouzidisDepartment of Social Medicine & Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University (PMU), 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2248-489X
Marc BisnaireCardiology Research and Scientific Advancements, UVA Research, Toronto, ON L3R 3Z3, Canada.
Dafni CharisopoulouAcademic Centre for Congenital Heart Disease, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Medical University of Silesia · PLPomeranian Medical University · PLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is an integral part of clinical decision support systems (CDSS), offering methods to approximate human reasoning and computationally infer decisions. Such methods are generally based on medical knowledge, either directly encoded with rules or automatically extracted from medical data using machine learning (ML). ML techniques, such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs), are based on mathematical models with parameters that can be optimally tuned using appropriate algorithms. The ever-increasing computational capacity of today's computer systems enables more complex ML systems with millions of parameters, bringing AI closer to human intelligence. With this objective, the term deep learning (DL) has been introduced to characterize ML based on deep ANN (DNN) architectures with multiple layers of artificial neurons. Despite all of these promises, the impact of AI in current clinical practice is still limited. However, this could change shortly, as the significantly increased papers in AI, machine learning and deep learning in cardiology show. We highlight the significant achievements of recent years in nearly all areas of cardiology and underscore the mounting evidence suggesting how AI will take a central stage in the field.

Indexed as

arrythmiasartificial intelligencecardiac imagingcardiologyheart failurevoice technology

Identifiers

PMID35807195
PMCPMC9267740
OpenAlexW4284672748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.