Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807185›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

How Old Is Old? An Age-Stratified Analysis of Elderly Liver Donors above 65.

Philipp Houben, Eike Bormann, Felicia Kneifel, Shadi Katou, Mehmet Haluk Morgül, Thomas Vogel, Ralf Bahde, Sonia Radünz, Andreas Pascher, Hartmut Schmidt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Donor Proteinuria and Allograft Function in Kidney Transplantation: Short- and Long-Term Results From a Retrospective Cohort Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Bariatric surgery in liver cirrhosis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp HoubenDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Eike BormannInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Felicia KneifelDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Shadi KatouDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5482-7458
Mehmet Haluk MorgülDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Thomas VogelDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3275-7329
Ralf BahdeDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Sonia RadünzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3874-1336
Andreas PascherDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Hartmut SchmidtDepartment of Internal Medicine B, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Jens Gunther BrockmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Felix BeckerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In liver transplantation, older donor age is a well-known risk factor for dismal outcomes, especially due to the high susceptibility of older grafts to ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, whether the factors correlating with impaired graft and patient survival following the transplantation of older grafts follow a linear trend among elderly donors remains elusive. In this study, liver transplantations between January 2006 and May 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Ninety-two recipients of grafts from donors ≥65 years were identified and divided into two groups: (1) ≥65-69 and (2) ≥ 70 years. One-year patient survival was comparable between recipients of grafts from donors ≥65-69 and ≥70 years (78.9% and 70.0%). One-year graft survival was 73.1% (donor ≥65-69) and 62.5% (donor ≥ 70), while multivariate analysis revealed superior one-year graft survival to be associated with a donor age of ≥65-69. No statistically significant differences were found for rates of primary non-function. The influence of donor age on graft and patient survival appears not to have a distinct impact on dismal outcomes in the range of 65-70 years. The impact of old donor age needs to be balanced with other risk factors, as these donors provide grafts that offer a lifesaving graft function.

Indexed as

ageelderly donorischemia-reperfusion injuryliver transplantationold donorrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID35807185
PMCPMC9267186
OpenAlexW4283790655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.