Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807141›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Usefulness of the Urine Methylation Test (Bladder EpiCheck

Karla B Peña, Francesc Riu, Anna Hernandez, Carmen Guilarte, Joan Badia, David Parada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Role of Bladder EpiCheckJournal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karla B PeñaMolecular Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, 43204 Reus, Spain.
Francesc RiuMolecular Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, 43204 Reus, Spain.
Anna HernandezMolecular Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, 43204 Reus, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0954-295X
Carmen GuilarteMolecular Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, 43204 Reus, Spain.
Joan BadiaInstitut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, 43204 Reus, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7446-7365
David ParadaMolecular Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, 43204 Reus, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8894-2312

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial bladder cancer is a heterogeneous disease and one of the most common cancers worldwide. Bladder cancer ranges from low-grade tumors that recur and require long-term invasive surveillance to high-grade tumors with high mortality. After the initial contemporary treatment in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, recurrence and progression rates remain high. Follow-up of these patients involves the use of cystoscopies, cytology, and imaging of the upper urinary tract in selected patients. However, in this context, both cystoscopy and cytology have limitations. In the follow-up of bladder cancer, the finding of urothelial cells with abnormal cytological characteristics is common. The main objective of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of a urine DNA methylation test in patients with urothelial bladder cancer under follow-up and a cytological finding of urothelial cell atypia. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between the urine DNA methylation test, urine cytology, and subsequent cystoscopy study. It was a prospective and descriptive cohort study conducted on patients presenting with non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma between 1 January 2018 and 31 May 2022. A voided urine sample and a DNA methylation test was extracted from each patient. A total of 70 patients, 58 male and 12 female, with a median age of 70.03 years were studied. High-grade urothelial carcinoma was the main histopathological diagnosis. Of the cytologies, 41.46% were cataloged as atypical urothelial cells. The DNA methylation test was positive in 17 urine samples, 51 were negative and 2 were invalid. We demonstrated the usefulness of a DNA methylation test in the follow-up of patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma. The methylation test also helps to diagnose urothelial cell atypia.

Indexed as

atypiabladdercancercytologyDNAmethylationurothelial

Identifiers

PMID35807141
PMCPMC9267544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.