Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807135›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Retinal Glaucoma Public Datasets: What Do We Have and What Is Missing?

José Camara, Roberto Rezende, Ivan Miguel Pires, António Cunha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Through the Eye: Retinal Changes of Prenatal Mercury Exposure in Grassy Narrows First Nation, Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José CamaraDepartamento de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Aberta, 1250-100 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2207-0897
Roberto RezendeDepartamento de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Aberta, 1250-100 Lisboa, Portugal.
Ivan Miguel PiresEscola de Ciências e Tecnologia, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3394-6762
António CunhaEscola de Ciências e Tecnologia, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3458-7693
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50008/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50014/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public databases for glaucoma studies contain color images of the retina, emphasizing the optic papilla. These databases are intended for research and standardized automated methodologies such as those using deep learning techniques. These techniques are used to solve complex problems in medical imaging, particularly in the automated screening of glaucomatous disease. The development of deep learning techniques has demonstrated potential for implementing protocols for large-scale glaucoma screening in the population, eliminating possible diagnostic doubts among specialists, and benefiting early treatment to delay the onset of blindness. However, the images are obtained by different cameras, in distinct locations, and from various population groups and are centered on multiple parts of the retina. We can also cite the small number of data, the lack of segmentation of the optic papillae, and the excavation. This work is intended to offer contributions to the structure and presentation of public databases used in the automated screening of glaucomatous papillae, adding relevant information from a medical point of view. The gold standard public databases present images with segmentations of the disc and cupping made by experts and division between training and test groups, serving as a reference for use in deep learning architectures. However, the data offered are not interchangeable. The quality and presentation of images are heterogeneous. Moreover, the databases use different criteria for binary classification with and without glaucoma, do not offer simultaneous pictures of the two eyes, and do not contain elements for early diagnosis.

Indexed as

databasesglaucomaglaucoma screeningmachine learningretinal images

Identifiers

PMID35807135
PMCPMC9267177
OpenAlexW4283797771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.