Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807104›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Use of Positron Emission Tomography for Pregnancy-Associated Cancer Assessment: A Review.

Giulia Parpinel, Maria Elena Laudani, Francesca Paola Giunta, Chiara Germano, Paolo Zola, Bianca Masturzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The oxidative stress paradigm in arbovirus infections: mechanisms and therapeutic insights.Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Optimisation of low and ultra-low dose scanning protocols for ultra-extended field of view PET in a real-world clinical setting.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Article
  10. Contrast Agents during Pregnancy: Pros and Cons When Really Needed.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giulia ParpinelUnit of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2U, Sant'Anna Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0237-2652
Maria Elena LaudaniUnit of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2U, Sant'Anna Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Francesca Paola GiuntaUnit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Chiara GermanoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale degli Infermi, 13875 Ponderano, Italy.
Paolo ZolaUnit of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2U, Sant'Anna Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Bianca MasturzoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale degli Infermi, 13875 Ponderano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5243-0940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

18F-FDGcancerdosimetrypositron emission tomographypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35807104
PMCPMC9267808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.