Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807088›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Outcomes of XEN 63 Device at 18-Month Follow-Up in Glaucoma Patients: A Two-Center Retrospective Study.

Antonio Maria Fea, Martina Menchini, Alessandro Rossi, Chiara Posarelli, Lorenza Malinverni, Michele Figus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Two-years efficacy and safety of bleb forming devices in uncontrolled glaucoma.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Outcomes of Ab Interno 63 µm vs. 45 µm XENJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Reducing Postoperative Needling in XEN63Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Efficacy and Safety of Ab Externo Open Conjunctiva XENJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. XENJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio Maria FeaStruttura Complessa Oculistica, Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche-Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Martina MenchiniDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine-University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro RossiStruttura Complessa Oculistica, Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche-Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9618-7716
Chiara PosarelliDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine-University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0222-5177
Lorenza MalinverniStruttura Complessa Oculistica, Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche-Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Michele FigusDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine-University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2243-9033
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

AbbVie (United States) Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Glaucoma surgery has significantly evolved over the last years. This paper aims to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of the XEN63 device in a real-world scenario. Methods: A retrospective clinical study was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent an XEN63 implant insertion, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification. The primary endpoint was the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at the month 18 visit. Results: Twenty-three eyes (23 patients) were included in the analysis. The preoperative IOP was significantly lowered from 27.0 ± 7.8 mmHg to 14.1 ± 3.4 mmHg at month 18 (p < 0.0001). At month 18, 14 (77.8%) and 11 (61.1%) eyes had an IOP ≤ 16 mmHg and ≤ 14 mmHg, respectively, without ocular hypotensive medication. The mean number of ocular hypotensive medication taken was significantly reduced from 2.3 ± 0.9 drugs at baseline to 1.0 ± 1.4 drugs at month 18 (p = 0.0020). Four (17.4%) eyes had hypotony at postoperative day 1, which was successfully resolved without sequelae. Four (17.4%) eyes underwent a needling procedure and four (17.4%) eyes underwent additional surgeries. Conclusions: The XEN63, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery, significantly lowered the IOP and reduced the need for ocular hypotensive drugs over a period of 18 months.

Indexed as

MIGSminimally invasive glaucoma surgeryopen-angle glaucomaXEN63

Identifiers

PMID35807088
PMCPMC9267545
OpenAlexW4283764787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.