Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807083›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Octogenarians Are the New Sexagenarians: Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Inferior to Posterior-Stabilized Arthroplasty in Octogenarian Patients.

Riccardo D'Ambrosi, Prem Haridas Menon, Abhijeet Salunke, Ilaria Mariani, Giovanni Palminteri, Giuseppe Basile, Nicola Ursino, Laura Mangiavini, Michael Hantes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Riccardo D'AmbrosiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1216-792X
Prem Haridas MenonDivision of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Government Medical College Trivandrum, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Thiruvananthapuram 695011, India.
Abhijeet SalunkeGujarat Cancer Research Institute, Ahemadabad 380016, India.
Ilaria MarianiInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", 34137 Trieste, Italy.
Giovanni PalminteriIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe BasileIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.
Nicola UrsinoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.
Laura MangiaviniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.
Michael HantesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessalia, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
University of Milan · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITGovernment Medical College · INGujarat Cancer & Research Institute · INIRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITUniversity Hospital of Larissa · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The primary goal of this study was to compare survivorship and functional results in individuals aged 80 and over who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilized (PS) implants. Methods: We prospectively analyzed the clinical records of two consecutive cohorts for a total of 96 implants in patients aged 80 years or over. The first cohort consisted of 59 consecutive cemented PS cases, while the second cohort comprised 37 consecutive cemented CR cases. The decision to either perform a PS or CR arthroplasty was taken based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings. The clinical evaluation entailed evaluating each patient’s visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), range of motion (flexion and extension), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Each patient was clinically evaluated the day before surgery (T0) and at two consecutive follow-ups at least 1 (T1) and 2 (T2) years after surgery. Implant survival was calculated using the Kaplan−Meier method. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant improvements at each follow-up compared with the preoperative values (p < 0.05). The CR group showed a higher flexion degree at T1 than the PS group (116.14 ± 5.57° versus 113.16 ± 7.66°; p = 0.048). No differences were found between the two groups regarding survival rate (chi-squared test p-value = 0.789). Three failures were noted in the CR group, while there were four in the PS group. Conclusions: This prospective clinical study demonstrates that CR and PS TKA had similar clinical outcomes in octogenarians with regard to knee function, postoperative knee pain, and other complications. Prosthesis survivorship for CR and PS TKA were both satisfactory, and in selected octogenarian patients, CR TKA should always be considered because of the reduced surgical time.

Indexed as

cruciate-retainingknee arthroplastyknee osteoarthritisoctogenarianposterior-stabilizedsurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID35807083
PMCPMC9267517
OpenAlexW4283738802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.