ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Comparison of the Effects of High-Power Diode Laser and Electrocautery for Lingual Frenectomy in Infants: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07557875 (Evaluation of the Healing Efficacy of Diode Laser in Lingual Frenectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Healing Efficacy of Diode Laser in Lingual Frenectomy
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diode laser versus scalpel in the surgical treatment of infant ankyloglossia: a randomized, parallel, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.BMC pediatrics · 2025Trial
- The Thermal and Histological Evaluation of Lingual Frenulum Incision Using Diode Lasers in an Experimental Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- In Vivo Evaluation of Diode Laser Use in Lingual Frenectomy: A Histological and Histomorphometric Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Ankyloglossia in Newborns: Clinical Implications and Management-A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Preprosthetic vestibuloplasty performed by three different types of lasers versus conventional scalpel.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Allergic Reactions to Tetracaine-Phenylephrine in Neonatal Lingual Frenotomy: Clinical Insights.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Successful Diode Laser Management of a Lip Pyogenic Granuloma in a Patient With Anemia.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Article
- Atmospheric Plasma Lingual Frenectomy Followed by Post Operative Tongue Exercises: A Case Series.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the release of the lingual frenulum through frenectomy in newborns zero to 90 days of age who breastfed and had diagnosis of ankyloglossia with an indication for surgery, comparing two methods: electrocautery and a high-power diode laser. Fifty-seven patients were randomly allocated to two groups (23 submitted to electrocautery and 34 submitted to a high power diode laser). Tongue movements were evaluated based on a clinical assessment and using the Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool (BTAT) before and 15 days after the surgical procedures. The visual analog scale was administered to the mothers on the same occasions for the measurement of pain during breastfeeding. Both groups had an increased BTAT score (favorable outcome) at the post-surgical evaluation, but the anterior third of the tongue was not always free to enable the movements necessary for lingual functions. It is fundamental for surgeons to have skill and in-depth knowledge of the equipment used to avoid accidents and complications in the region of important structures. Both techniques employed in this study were safe and effective, causing little bleeding and few postoperative complications. The group submitted to a high-power diode laser exhibited less post-surgical bleeding compared to the group submitted to electrocautery and no inflammation at the edges of the surgical cut.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.