Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35806973›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Gynecological Cancers in Lynch Syndrome: A Comparison of the Histological Features with Sporadic Cases of the General Population.

Valentina Elisabetta Bounous, Elisabetta Robba, Stefania Perotto, Barbara Pasini, Nicoletta Tomasi Cont, Maria Teresa Ricci, Antonino Ditto, Marco Vitellaro, Francesco Raspagliesi, Nicoletta Biglia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina Elisabetta BounousAcademic Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology-A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy.
Elisabetta RobbaAcademic Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology-A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy.
Stefania PerottoOspedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, 12060 Verduno, Italy.
Barbara PasiniDepartment of Genetics, Biology and Biochemistry, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4373-1212
Nicoletta Tomasi ContASL TO 3, 10093 Collegno, Italy.
Maria Teresa RicciUnit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Fondazione IRCCs-National Cancer Institute, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Antonino DittoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCs-National Cancer Institute, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Marco VitellaroUnit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Fondazione IRCCs-National Cancer Institute, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-5315
Francesco RaspagliesiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCs-National Cancer Institute, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Nicoletta BigliaAcademic Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology-A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1009-5309
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITA. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 · ITOspedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: About 5% of endometrial cancers (ECs) are attributed to an inherited predisposition, for which Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for the majority of cases. Women with LS have a 40−60% predicted lifetime risk of developing EC, in addition to a 40−80% lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer and other cancers. In this population, the lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer (OC) is 10−12%. Object: to compare the histopathological features of LS-associated EC and OC with sporadic cancers in order to evaluate whether there are differences in terms of age at diagnosis, site of occurrence in the uterus, histological type, stage at diagnosis, and tumor grading. Materials and methods: we compared data obtained from 96 patients with LS-associated gynecological cancers (82 with EC and 14 with OC) to a control group (CG) of 209 patients who developed sporadic EC, and a CG of 187 patients with sporadic OC. Results: The mean age at diagnosis of LS-associated EC and OC was much lower than in the control groups. In both groups with EC, the endometrioid histotype was the most frequently occurring histotype. However, among LS women there was a significantly higher incidence of clear cell tumors (11% versus 2.4% in the CG, p = 0.0001). Similar to the sporadic cancer cases, most of the LS-associated ECs presented at an early stage (89% of cases at FIGO I-II stage). In the LS group, the tumor frequently involved only the inner half of the endometrium (77% of cases, p < 0.01). In the LS group, 7.3% of ECs were localized to the lower uterine segment (LUS), whereas no cancer developed in the LUS in the CG. No serous OCs were diagnosed in the LS group (versus 45.5% in the CG, p = 0.0009). Most of the LS-associated OCs presented at an early stage (85% of cases at FIGO I-II stages, p < 0.01). Conclusion: LS-associated EC and OC seem to have peculiar features, occurring at a younger age and at an earlier stage. In LS, EC less frequently involves the outer half of the endometrium, with a more frequent occurrence in the LUS. The presence of clear cell EC was more frequently observed, whereas in OC, the predominant histotype was endometrioid.

Indexed as

endometrial cancerLynch syndromemismatch repair genesovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID35806973
PMCPMC9267402
OpenAlexW4283651269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.