Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35806969›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Development of a Deep-Learning Algorithm for Small Bowel-Lesion Detection and a Study of the Improvement in the False-Positive Rate.

Naoki Hosoe, Tomofumi Horie, Anna Tojo, Hinako Sakurai, Yukie Hayashi, Kenji Jose-Luis Limpias Kamiya, Tomohisa Sujino, Kaoru Takabayashi, Haruhiko Ogata, Takanori Kanai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naoki HosoeCenter for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4516-5648
Tomofumi HorieDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Anna TojoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Hinako SakuraiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Yukie HayashiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Kenji Jose-Luis Limpias KamiyaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Tomohisa SujinoCenter for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Kaoru TakabayashiCenter for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Haruhiko OgataCenter for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Takanori KanaiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Keio University · JPKeio University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has recently been gaining attention as a promising technology to improve the identification of lesions, and deep-learning algorithms for lesion detection have been actively developed in small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). We developed a detection algorithm for abnormal findings by deep learning (convolutional neural network) the SBCE imaging data of 30 cases with abnormal findings. To enable the detection of a wide variety of abnormal findings, the training data were balanced to include all major findings identified in SBCE (bleeding, angiodysplasia, ulceration, and neoplastic lesions). To reduce the false-positive rate, "findings that may be responsible for hemorrhage" and "findings that may require therapeutic intervention" were extracted from the images of abnormal findings and added to the training dataset. For the performance evaluation, the sensitivity and the specificity were calculated using 271 detectable findings in 35 cases. The sensitivity was calculated using 68,494 images of non-abnormal findings. The sensitivity and specificity were 93.4% and 97.8%, respectively. The average number of images detected by the algorithm as having abnormal findings was 7514. We developed an image-reading support system using deep learning for SBCE and obtained a good detection performance.

Indexed as

angioectasiadeep learningobscure gastrointestinal bleedingtumorvideo-capsule endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID35806969
PMCPMC9267395
OpenAlexW4283523104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.