ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
The Bone Lid Technique in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07338136 (Computer Guided Split Thickness Versus Full Thickness Flap Buccal Bone Lid Approach in Hard Mandibular Pathosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Computer Guided Split Thickness Versus Full Thickness Flap Buccal Bone Lid Approach in Hard Mandibular Pathosis: Randomized Control Trial RCT
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expert consensus on the management of third molar health.International journal of oral science · 2026Review
- Efficacy of piezoelectric surgery in the conservative management of unicystic ameloblastoma: a 5-year retrospective cohort study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Current Updates and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Expert consensus on apical microsurgery.International journal of oral science · 2025Review
- Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel vs Turbine Drill in Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: Impact on Postoperative Pain and Inflammation.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Breakthroughs in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review aimed at reporting the outcomes of the bone lid technique in oral surgery in terms of bone healing, ridge preservation, and incidence of complications. Bone-cutting instruments and stabilization methods were also considered. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched using a combination of terms, including bone lid, bony window, piezosurgery, microsaw, cysts, endodontic surgery, impacted teeth, and maxillary sinus. A hand search was also performed. The last search was conducted on 30 November 2021. No date limitation was set. Searches were restricted to human clinical studies published in English. All types of study design were considered except reviews and case reports. After a two-step evaluation, 20 (2 randomized studies, 2 case-control studies, 3 cohort studies, 13 case series) out of 647 screened studies were included, reporting on 752 bone lid procedures. The bone lid technique was associated with favorable bone healing when compared to other methods, and with a very low incidence of major complications. Clinical indications, surgical procedures, study design, follow-up duration, and outcomes varied among the studies. Overall, favorable outcomes were reported using the bone lid approach, though evidence-based studies were scarce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.