Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35806929›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Traumatology: Adoption of the Sm@rtEven Application for the Remote Evaluation of Patients and Possible Medico-Legal Implications.

Giuseppe Basile, Riccardo Accetta, Susanna Marinelli, Riccardo D'Ambrosi, Quirino Alessandro Petrucci, Arianna Giorgetti, Alessandro Nuara, Simona Zaami, Stefania Fozzato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Peri-implant femoral fractures in elderly: Morbidity, mortality, treatment options and good practices.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giuseppe BasileIRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedics Institute, 20161 Milano, Italy.
Riccardo AccettaIRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedics Institute, 20161 Milano, Italy.
Susanna MarinelliSchool of Law, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.
Riccardo D'AmbrosiIRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedics Institute, 20161 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1216-792X
Quirino Alessandro PetrucciDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Arianna GiorgettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro NuaraIRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedics Institute, 20161 Milano, Italy.
Simona ZaamiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-7139
Stefania FozzatoIRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedics Institute, 20161 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-2614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine is the combination of technologies and activities that offer new remote ways of medical care. The Sm@rtEven application project is a remote assistance service that follows patients affected by lower limb fractures surgically treated at Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute (Milan, Italy). The Sm@rtEven application aims to evaluate the clinical conditions of patients treated for lower limb fracture after discharge from hospital using remote follow-up (FU). The project is not a substitute for traditional clinical consultations but an additional tool for a more complete and prolonged view over time. The Sm@rtEven application is installed on patients' smartphones and is used daily to communicate with healthcare personnel. In the first protocol, patients had to complete different tasks for 30 days, such as monitoring the load progression on the affected limb, the number of steps during the day, and body temperature and completing a questionnaire. A simplified protocol was proposed due to the pandemic and logistical issues. The revised protocol enrolled patients after more than 30 days of their operation, prioritized the rehabilitation phase, and required patients to use the app for fewer days. After an initial phase of correct use, a reduction in patient compliance was gradually reported in the first protocol. However, patient compliance in the second protocol remained high (96.25%) in the recording of all the required parameters. The Sm@rtEven application has proven to be a valuable tool for following patients remotely, especially during the pandemic. Telemedicine has the same value as traditional clinical evaluations, and it enables patients to be followed over long distances and over time, minimizing any discomfort.

Indexed as

European Union regulatory frameworkforensic medicinehealth serviceslower limb fracturerehabilitationremote follow-uptelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35806929
PMCPMC9267866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.