ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022
The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subscapularis sparing approach vs. tenotomy of the subscapularis tendon in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Trial
- Investigating the surgical outcomes transitioning from a traditional grammont-style valgus-medialized reverse shoulder arthroplasty to a varus lateralized reverse shoulder implant.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is safe and effective in patients ≥90 Years old.JSES international · 2026Article
- Demographic-, Radiographic-, and Surgery-Related Factors Do Not Affect Functional Internal Rotation Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Finite element analysis part 2 of 2: Glenohumeral bone stress distribution depends on implant configuration for anatomic and reverse stemless shoulder implants.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Midterm outcomes of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of studies with minimum 5-year follow-up.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2024Review
- Influence of Lateralization and Distalization on Joint Function after Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Narrative review of influence of prosthesis lateralization on clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: glenoidAnnals of joint · 2023Review
- Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Influence of neck shaft angle of humerus in prosthesis design.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and any complications were reviewed. Eleven papers were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. A total of 971 shoulders were evaluated at a minimum-follow up of 12 months, and a maximum of 120 months. The sample size for the "HNSA 155°" group is 449 patients, the "HNSA 145°" group involves 140 patients, and the "HSNA 135°" group comprises 291 patients. The HNSA represents an important variable in choosing the RSA implant design for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. Positive outcomes are described for all the 155°, 145°, and 135° HSNA groups. Among the different implant designs, the 155° group show a better SST score, but also the highest rate of revisions and scapular notching; the 145° cohort achieve the best values in terms of active forward flexion, abduction, ASES score, and CMS, but also the highest rate of infections; while the 135° design obtains the best results in the external rotation with arm at side, but also the highest rate of fractures. High-quality studies are required to obtain valid results regarding the best prosthesis implant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.