Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35806915›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

TMJ Position in Symmetric Dentofacial Deformity.

Victor Ravelo, Gabriela Olate, Marcio de Moraes, Henry Garcia Guevara, Marcelo Parra, Sergio Olate

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Victor RaveloResearch Undergraduate Group in Dentistry (GIPO), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4810101, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-5988-3723
Gabriela OlateCenter of Excellence in Morphological and Surgical Studies (CEMyQ), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile.
Marcio de MoraesDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba 13400-001, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5229-5723
Henry Garcia GuevaraDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Ortopedico Infantil, Caracas 1050, Venezuela.
Marcelo ParraCenter of Excellence in Morphological and Surgical Studies (CEMyQ), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile.
Sergio OlateCenter of Excellence in Morphological and Surgical Studies (CEMyQ), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-8153-0676
Universidad de La Frontera · CLHospital Clínico Universitario de Caracas · VEUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this research was to analyze the facial class, presence of malocclusion, and the mandibular plane and to relate this to the mandibular condyle position. A cross-sectional study in subjects under analysis for orthognathic surgery was done. The mandibular plane, the gonial angle, and the molar class were included to compare the coronal and sagittal position of the condyle and the joint space observed in the CBCT. The measurements were obtained by the same observer at an interval of two weeks. In addition, the Spearman test was performed to determine the correlation using a p value < 0.05 to observe any significant differences. Eighty-nine male and female subjects (18 to 58 years old, 24.6 ± 10.5) were included. In the coronal section, subjects with CIII had a greater mediolateral distance (MLD, p = 0.0001) and greater vertical distance (SID, p = 0.0001) than subjects with CII. In terms of the skeletal class and the mandibular plane, it was observed that subjects in the CII group had a greater mandibular angle (open angle) (p = 0.04) than the CII group and was related to the anterior position of the condyle. The most anterior condylar position was observed in the CII group (p = 0.03), whereas a posterior condylar position was significant in CIII subjects (p = 0.03). We can conclude that the sagittal position of the TMJ was related to the mandibular plane and the skeletal class showing a higher mandibular angle and most anterior position of the condyle in CII subjects and a lower mandibular angle and most posterior position of the condyle in CIII subjects. The implications for surgical treatment have to be considered.

Indexed as

dentofacial deformityorthognathic surgerysymmetrytemporomandibular joint

Identifiers

PMID35806915
PMCPMC9267339
OpenAlexW4283381728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.