Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35806818›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Proposal for Some Affordable Laboratory Biofilm Reactors and Their Critical Evaluations from Practical Viewpoints.

Hikonaru Kudara, Hideyuki Kanematsu, Dana M Barry, Akiko Ogawa, Takeshi Kogo, Hidekazu Miura, Risa Kawai, Nobumitsu Hirai, Takehito Kato, Michiko Yoshitake

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hikonaru KudaraNational Institute of Technology (KOSEN), Suzuka College, Suzuka 510-0294, Japan.
Hideyuki KanematsuNational Institute of Technology (KOSEN), Suzuka College, Suzuka 510-0294, Japan.
Dana M BarryDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5662-7548
Akiko OgawaNational Institute of Technology (KOSEN), Suzuka College, Suzuka 510-0294, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8684-288X
Takeshi KogoNational Institute of Technology (KOSEN), Suzuka College, Suzuka 510-0294, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8453-8830
Hidekazu MiuraFaculty of Medical Engineering, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Suzuka 510-0293, Japan.
Risa KawaiNational Institute of Technology (KOSEN), Suzuka College, Suzuka 510-0294, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7524-8084
Nobumitsu HiraiNational Institute of Technology (KOSEN), Suzuka College, Suzuka 510-0294, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3400-7417
Takehito KatoNational Institute of Technology (KOSEN), Oyama College, Oyama 323-0806, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2449-5645
Michiko YoshitakeNational Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-5666
National Institute of Technology, Kagoshima College · JPNational Institute for Materials Science · JPSUNY Canton · USSuzuka University of Medical Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are a result of bacterial activities and are found everywhere. They often form on metal surfaces and on the surfaces of polymeric compounds. Biofilms are sticky and mostly consist of water. They have a strong resistance to antimicrobial agents and can cause serious problems for modern medicine and industry. Biofilms are composed of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) such as polysaccharides produced from bacterial cells and are dominated by water at the initial stage. In a series of experiments, using Escherichia coli, we developed three types of laboratory biofilm reactors (LBR) to simulate biofilm formation. For the first trial, we used a rotary type of biofilm reactor for stirring. For the next trial, we tried another rotary type of reactor where the circular plate holding specimens was rotated. Finally, a circular laboratory biofilm reactor was used. Biofilms were evaluated by using a crystal violet staining method and by using Raman spectroscopy. Additionally, they were compared to each other from the practical (industrial) viewpoints. The third type was the best to form biofilms in a short period. However, the first and second were better from the viewpoint of "ease of use". All of these have their own advantages and disadvantages, respectively. Therefore, they should be properly selected and used for specific and appropriate purposes in the future.

Indexed as

biofilmslaboratory biofilm reactorsLBR

Identifiers

PMID35806818
PMCPMC9267959
OpenAlexW4283820622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.