Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35806415›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Network-Based Approaches for Disease-Gene Association Prediction Using Protein-Protein Interaction Networks.

Yoonbee Kim, Jong-Hoon Park, Young-Rae Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Drug Repositioning Based on Deep Sparse Autoencoder and Drug-Disease Similarity.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Recent Advances in Protein-Protein Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yoonbee KimDivision of Software, Yonsei University Mirae Campus, Wonju-si 26493, Gangwon-do, Korea.
Jong-Hoon ParkDivision of Software, Yonsei University Mirae Campus, Wonju-si 26493, Gangwon-do, Korea.
Young-Rae ChoDivision of Software, Yonsei University Mirae Campus, Wonju-si 26493, Gangwon-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4645-2542

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1A2C101194612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) can be used to infer genome intervals that are involved in genetic diseases. However, investigating a large number of putative mutations for GWAS is resource- and time-intensive. Network-based computational approaches are being used for efficient disease-gene association prediction. Network-based methods are based on the underlying assumption that the genes causing the same diseases are located close to each other in a molecular network, such as a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. In this survey, we provide an overview of network-based disease-gene association prediction methods based on three categories: graph-theoretic algorithms, machine learning algorithms, and an integration of these two. We experimented with six selected methods to compare their prediction performance using a heterogeneous network constructed by combining a genome-wide weighted PPI network, an ontology-based disease network, and disease-gene associations. The experiment was conducted in two different settings according to the presence and absence of known disease-associated genes. The results revealed that HerGePred, an integrative method, outperformed in the presence of known disease-associated genes, whereas PRINCE, which adopted a network propagation algorithm, was the most competitive in the absence of known disease-associated genes. Overall, the results demonstrated that the integrative methods performed better than the methods using graph-theory only, and the methods using a heterogeneous network performed better than those using a homogeneous PPI network only.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyProtein Interaction MapsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyMachine Learningdisease-gene associationsdisease gene prioritizationdisease networksheterogeneous networksprotein-protein interaction networks

Identifiers

PMID35806415
PMCPMC9266751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.