Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35806212›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Glioblastoma Treatment: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.

Alejandro Rodríguez-Camacho, José Guillermo Flores-Vázquez, Júlia Moscardini-Martelli, Jorge Alejandro Torres-Ríos, Alejandro Olmos-Guzmán, Cindy Sharon Ortiz-Arce, Dharely Raquel Cid-Sánchez, Samuel Rosales Pérez, Monsserrat Del Sagrario Macías-González, Laura Crystell Hernández-Sánchez and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sonoselective Transfection of Glioma Endothelium.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandro Rodríguez-CamachoRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0486-4039
José Guillermo Flores-VázquezRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5213-3054
Júlia Moscardini-MartelliRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3468-5418
Jorge Alejandro Torres-RíosRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1739-0933
Alejandro Olmos-GuzmánHospital de Especialidades No.1 Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, León 37680, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8237-4166
Cindy Sharon Ortiz-ArceHospital de Especialidades No.1 Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, León 37680, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4839-2598
Dharely Raquel Cid-SánchezCentro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City 06720, Mexico.
Samuel Rosales PérezCentro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City 06720, Mexico.
Monsserrat Del Sagrario Macías-GonzálezHospital General Regional #20, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Tijuana 22115, Mexico.
Laura Crystell Hernández-SánchezRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.
Juan Carlos Heredia-GutiérrezRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.
Gabriel Alejandro Contreras-PalafoxRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.
José de Jesús Emilio Suárez-CamposRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.
Miguel Ángel Celis-LópezRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.
Guillermo Axayacalt Gutiérrez-AcevesRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.
Sergio Moreno-JiménezRadioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City 14269, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MXHospital de Especialidades · MXCentro Médico ABC · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Glioblastoma is the most frequent and lethal primary tumor of the central nervous system. Through many years, research has brought various advances in glioblastoma treatment. At this time, glioblastoma management is based on maximal safe surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with temozolomide. Recently, bevacizumab has been added to the treatment arsenal for the recurrent scenario. Nevertheless, patients with glioblastoma still have a poor prognosis. Therefore, many efforts are being made in different clinical research areas to find a new alternative to improve overall survival, free-progression survival, and life quality in glioblastoma patients. (2) Methods: Our objective is to recap the actual state-of-the-art in glioblastoma treatment, resume the actual research and future perspectives on immunotherapy, as well as the new synthetic molecules and natural compounds that represent potential future therapies at preclinical stages. (3) Conclusions: Despite the great efforts in therapeutic research, glioblastoma management has suffered minimal changes, and the prognosis remains poor. Combined therapeutic strategies and delivery methods, including immunotherapy, synthetic molecules, natural compounds, and glioblastoma stem cell inhibition, may potentiate the standard of care therapy and represent the next step in glioblastoma management research.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaBevacizumabDacarbazineHumansTemozolomideBevacizumabDacarbazineTemozolomideglioblastomaimmunotherapyneurosurgeryradiotherapytarget therapytemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID35806212
PMCPMC9267036
OpenAlexW4283691895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.