Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35806206›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Genes Possessing the Most Frequent DNA DSBs Are Highly Associated with Development and Cancers, and Essentially Overlap with the rDNA-Contacting Genes.

Nickolai A Tchurikov, Ildar R Alembekov, Elena S Klushevskaya, Antonina N Kretova, Ann M Keremet, Anastasia E Sidorova, Polina B Meilakh, Vladimir R Chechetkin, Galina I Kravatskaya, Yuri V Kravatsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Strong Activation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nickolai A TchurikovDepartment of Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0826-3529
Ildar R AlembekovDepartment of Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Elena S KlushevskayaDepartment of Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Antonina N KretovaDepartment of Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Ann M KeremetDepartment of Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Anastasia E SidorovaDepartment of Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Polina B MeilakhDepartment of Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir R ChechetkinDepartment of Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Galina I KravatskayaDepartment of Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Yuri V KravatskyDepartment of Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation No. 21-14-00035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double-strand DNA breakes (DSBs) are the most deleterious and widespread examples of DNA damage. They inevitably originate from endogenous mechanisms in the course of transcription, replication, and recombination, as well as from different exogenous factors. If not properly repaired, DSBs result in cell death or diseases. Genome-wide analysis of DSBs has revealed the numerous endogenous DSBs in human chromosomes. However, until now, it has not been clear what kind of genes are preferentially subjected to breakage. We performed a genetic and epigenetic analysis of the most frequent DSBs in HEK293T cells. Here, we show that they predominantly occur in the active genes controlling differentiation, development, and morphogenesis. These genes are highly associated with cancers and other diseases. About one-third of the genes possessing frequent DSBs correspond to rDNA-contacting genes. Our data suggest that a specific set of active genes controlling morphogenesis are the main targets of DNA breakage in human cells, although there is a specific set of silent genes controlling metabolism that also are enriched in DSBs. We detected this enrichment by different activators and repressors of transcription at DSB target sites, as well breakage at promoters. We propose that both active transcription and silencing of genes give a propensity for DNA breakage. These results have implications for medicine and gene therapy.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedNeoplasmsDNA RepairDNA, RibosomalHEK293 CellsHumansDNA, Ribosomal4C-rDNAcancersdifferentiationDNA double strand breaks (DSBs)epigeneticsHEK293TmorphogenesisrDNA-contacting geneswhole-genome analysis

Identifiers

PMID35806206
PMCPMC9266645
OpenAlexW4283705409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.