ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
RNA Cleavage Properties of Nucleobase-Specific RNase MC1 and Cusativin Are Determined by the Dinucleotide-Binding Interactions in the Enzyme-Active Site.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- From nucleotides to intact transcripts through oligonucleotides: Integrated chromatographic strategies for therapeutic mRNA characterization.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Quantitative RNA modification mapping by mass spectrometry with isobaric tags and nucleobase fragment analysis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Oligonucleotide therapeutics in sports? An antidoping perspective.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2025Review
- Development of a Flow Through-Based Limited Digestion Approach for High-Throughput and High-Sequence Coverage Mapping of Therapeutic mRNAs.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Challenges and emerging trends in liquid chromatography-based analyses of mRNA pharmaceuticals.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Knowledge of the cleavage specificity of ribonucleases is critical for their application in RNA modification mapping or RNA-protein binding studies. Here, we detail the cleavage specificity and efficiency of ribonuclease MC1 and cusativin using a customized RNA sequence that contained all dinucleotide combinations and homopolymer sequences. The sequencing of the oligonucleotide digestion products by a semi-quantitative liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis documented as little as 0.5-1% cleavage levels for a given dinucleotide sequence combination. While RNase MC1 efficiently cleaved the [A/U/C]pU dinucleotide bond, no cleavage was observed for the GpU bond. Similarly, cusativin efficiently cleaved Cp[U/A/G] dinucleotide combinations along with UpA and [A/U]pU, suggesting a broader specificity of dinucleotide preferences. The molecular interactions between the substrate and active site as determined by the dinucleotide docking studies of protein models offered additional evidence and support for the observed substrate specificity. Targeted alteration of the key amino acid residues in the nucleotide-binding site confirms the utility of this
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.