Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805820›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Dietary Supplements Questioned in the Polish Notification Procedure upon the Basis of Data from the National Register of Functional Foods and the European System of the RASFF.

Kacper Wróbel, Anna Justyna Milewska, Michał Marczak, Remigiusz Kozłowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kacper WróbelDepartment of Management and Logistics in Healthcare, Medical University of Lodz, 90-131 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4272-5440
Anna Justyna MilewskaDepartment of Statistics and Medical Informatics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8028-5146
Michał MarczakDepartment of Management and Logistics in Healthcare, Medical University of Lodz, 90-131 Lodz, Poland.
Remigiusz KozłowskiCentre for Security Technologies in Logistics, Faculty of Management, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2781-5341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary supplements (DS) in the countries of the European Union falls within the scope of the food law. DS may, however, contain substances that are simultaneously applied in medicinal products as defined in the pharmaceutical law. The presence of such ingredients may cause problems with the product qualification. The phenomenon of applying such borderline ingredients in dietary supplements may require additional regulations, and ensuring them may be problematic. We conducted an analysis aiming to identify dishonest market practices resorted to by the producers and distributors of non-conforming dietary supplements. We examined mostly questioned DS and compared them with data from the RASFF system and registers of medicinal substances and pharmaceutical entities. The results show that some operators tend to re-notify the same products in response to the initiation of official control procedures. Products in the form of capsules or powders were the most common re-notifications within the 50-100 days. Based on the data obtained, it can be concluded that some entities are obliged to document the safety of the product or its compliance with the regulations, use the imperfection of the notification procedure, and re-notify the questioned product in order to keep it on the market despite potential non-compliance.

Indexed as

Consumer Product SafetyFunctional FoodDietary SupplementsPharmaceutical PreparationsPolandPharmaceutical Preparationsdietary supplementsGISnotificationRASFF

Identifiers

PMID35805820
PMCPMC9266288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.